GLM-5.2 vs Claude Opus | Tech Stackups
https://techstackups.com/comparisons/glm-5.2-vs-opus/Open linkView original on aussie.zonehttps://techstackups.com/comparisons/glm-5.2-vs-opus/Open linkView original on aussie.zonehttps://techstackups.com/comparisons/glm-5.2-vs-opus/Open linkView original on aussie.zone
"... mix of genuine signal and astroturf"
All of this has happened before. All of this will happen again.
Good read, this - cheers. I use claude to pair code and code review ... it's always interesting to have different house styles review code / pick up different things. Qwen, Codex and Claude all find different issues.
If GLM is truly capable now / not an excitable labrador, it may be worthwhile brining into the fold. Hell...if 5.3 becomes a one stop shop - or VL at least (OpenCode Go $10?) then it might be worth testing properly again. I tried 5.1 previously...it was solid but goes loopy if you give it the leg room / loves to be a "helpful assistant" and start making helpful changes.
I like GLM 5.2 it's good enough for practically everything I'm doing, especially tool calls.