Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.today

25 replies

sidebroreply
lemmy.zip

Almost like they don't give a shit if they harm kids

49
rayyyreply
piefed.social

It's either kids or profits for Zuck. Which is more important?

17

I'm sure this is partially what these ID laws are about, they know their product is harmful to not just kids but EVERYONE, but they don't want EVERYONE to stop using it, so what's the answer? Ban the kids

3
feddit.uk

We are merely the vessel with which to produce harm.

Facefuck, 2026.

28

How about just fix your god damn product so people won't constantly sue you? Business nowadays is just completely asinine

26

Mafia lobbies to get criminal law to be rewritten to remove punishments for crimes.

25

Almost as if the real goal is not protecting children, but surveillance.

22

They want to get products in the hands of very young children to create customers for life.

This is the happy meal strategy on steroids.

18

"We want this child safety bill to protect our corporation from children please" is such a good look

9

They'll get it too as long as they push it through before the midterms, maybe even after depending on what those look like

7

🧑‍⚖️: "But what if your best revenuing content creators are children?"
🤓: "That's why I need you to rewrite it."
👶🧒: "Wait... wat?!"

🤓: "Don't worry. I'll protect you guys."

6

Let's just make brutal fucking murder and large theft legal already! /s

6

Legislators: "and we just have to pass it guys, sorry. No choice in the meter. They propose it, we pass it for them. That's how this all works"

2

You reached the end