Don't worry, VHDL is still a mindfuck sometimes even after being an FPGA engineer for years (mostly only using VHDL). It's such a cool language, and I am glad you discovered and are enjoying it!
If this classic isn't linked from that Wikipedia article (I never checked) it really should be. Like the "static cling" image, evnen encyclopedias need to know when to step out of formal style. 🤭
Yes, no, maybe, I don't know, can you repeat the question?
You're not the boss of me, now!
Splunge!
I'm curious of what that means, but that link put me through five captchas in a row and I ran out of patience.
Youtube is giving you captchas? Ouch.
It's a Monty Python sketch. Here it is in text form.
Thanks! I'm on a VPN using graphene, so that's probably why YouTube doesn't like me.
BIG_IF_TRUEMissing the truth nuke
And DAMN_LIE
FAKE_NEWS (true but I don't like it)
I also propose a new binary operator CARES_ABOUT_YOUR_FEELINGS
MEGABULL ,
and
megabool::StatisticsDOUBLE_PLUS_UNTRUEMay I introduce the VHDL STD library where you can set an output to "don't care":
Wikipedia IEEE-1164
As an embedded electronics engineer discovering VHDL was a blast and a mindfuck!
Don't worry, VHDL is still a mindfuck sometimes even after being an FPGA engineer for years (mostly only using VHDL). It's such a cool language, and I am glad you discovered and are enjoying it!
its just what most people what vall illegal state or impossible?
I prefer the classic Bool:
Ah yes, the three genders.
If this classic isn't linked from that Wikipedia article (I never checked) it really should be. Like the "static cling" image, evnen encyclopedias need to know when to step out of formal style. 🤭
missing the classic
PANTS_ON_FIRE,Needs more emojis.
👍 = true👎 = false🫳 = maybe🤌 = Italian falseWhile working on some client code, my coworker and I came across a case statement that said something like
Ever since we've always laughed at the "trinary bit".
Damn JavaScript
I'd have gone with "truthy" and "falsy", but I like the cut of the jib all the same
I'm confused as to the use of double true.
I've been running a query adding TRUE entries to other TRUE entries, but I just get TRUE as result.
OK and NOT_OK
This is just reinvention of Łukasiewicz multi-valued logic
missing this_tbh
Quantum computer booleans. True/False/Everything in between.