CCameronDev programming.dev6Hide 6 repliesPsychotic: https://github.com/earthquake/XFLTReaT Tunnel your packets over DNS requests.39
nneidu3 replysh.itjust.works5Hide 5 repliesI used to do that once upon a time for free internet in airports16
jjohn_lemmy replyslrpnk.net1Hide 1 replyI get blocked often when trying to use Wireguard in similar scenarios, but I don't know what they are blocking specifically8
nneidu3 replysh.itjust.worksYeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish7
CCameronDev replyprogramming.dev1Hide 1 replyWhat was the performance like? I assume it would be pretty shit3
KKazumara replydiscuss.tchncs.deOh I remember that. I think it was called like the 53rd element as a reference to port 53 for DNS.2
lazynooblet lazysoci.al1Hide 1 replyHaving IKEv2 and IPsec as separate items doesn't make sense. IKEv2 is an authentication protocol, which IPsec can use for key exchange. Perhaps instead have "IKEv2/IPsec" and "L2TP/IPsec". Or even OpenSSH tunnels?17
nneidu3 replysh.itjust.worksYeah, I don't think I've ever used IKEv2 outside of IPsec. I have, however, used ipsec with Ike (fortinet) and l2tp (cisco)6
rrefalo programming.devSoftEther doesn't belong in one spot because it emulates several different types of VPN transports simultaneously: PPTP, IPsec, SSTP, OpenVPN, pure TLS etc.1
OOpisek piefed.blahaj.zoneWireguard lawful good? https://medium.com/@cyberlpz777/wireguard-as-a-stealth-c2-channel-abuse-of-modern-vpns-evasion-and-detection-a4663a2df874-1
Psychotic: https://github.com/earthquake/XFLTReaT
Tunnel your packets over DNS requests.
I used to do that once upon a time for free internet in airports
I get blocked often when trying to use Wireguard in similar scenarios, but I don't know what they are blocking specifically
Yeah, semi-public wifi is a lot more waterproof these days. My IPoDNS days were back in 2009ish
What was the performance like? I assume it would be pretty shit
It was, but it was better than nothing and quite convenient
Oh I remember that. I think it was called like the 53rd element as a reference to port 53 for DNS.
Having IKEv2 and IPsec as separate items doesn't make sense. IKEv2 is an authentication protocol, which IPsec can use for key exchange.
Perhaps instead have "IKEv2/IPsec" and "L2TP/IPsec". Or even OpenSSH tunnels?
Yeah, I don't think I've ever used IKEv2 outside of IPsec.
I have, however, used ipsec with Ike (fortinet) and l2tp (cisco)
Which one is Neutral Evil ?
Cisco AnyConnect
Why is Cisco Anyconnect neutral evil?
because Cisco
I am clueless
a clue! a clue!
SoftEther doesn't belong in one spot because it emulates several different types of VPN transports simultaneously: PPTP, IPsec, SSTP, OpenVPN, pure TLS etc.
Wireguard lawful good? https://medium.com/@cyberlpz777/wireguard-as-a-stealth-c2-channel-abuse-of-modern-vpns-evasion-and-detection-a4663a2df874