Spyke
photography·Photographybylimelight79

Photography is fun again

Not that it ever wasn't, really, but...After many years of crop-sensor cameras, I went full frame in ~2018 with the Nikon D750. It's a great camera, though I didn't use it much during the pandemic. The full frame lenses are really heavy, though, so photography felt like more like work instead of recreation.

A few months ago, I became a professional photographer, using the D750 and a Sigma 14-24 2.8 Art to do real estate photography. That setup has been great, no major issues, but if something happened to the body or the lens, I had no backups. And while it's still a capable camera, the D750 is a bit long in the tooth these days. In particular, its video capabilities are just not up to what my clients want (4K 60fps).

Last month, I bought a Nikon Z8 with the adapter so I could still use the Sigma F-mount lens. Then, last week, I bought the Nikon 14-24 Z lens to go with it. I've taken nearly a thousand pictures with the Z8 + Sigma lens, but almost all were for my real estate work.

First...wow, this is a light lens. It's unbelievable how light it is. The Sigma is 1,140 grams, or 2.5 lbs. The 14-24 Nikon Z is 650 grams, or 1.4 lbs. The difference is astounding. It's like going back to my D7000 with the 18-140 DX lens (490 gram, 1.1 lbs), but having a high quality, full frame 2.8 lens. It's easy to hold and handle.

Second, I love the results, so far. The picture is from Niagara Falls, and the haze you're seeing is mist from the waterfall. There's a nice rainbow at the bottom. The observation tower on the right is clearly distorted, but that's a normal artifact for a wide angle lenses. I'll play with Darktable some more to see if I can get it any better.

I'm really liking the Z8. It's faster than the D750 - first, picture taking is faster, because it doesn't have the mirror to move for every shot, and it doesn't have a mechanical shutter. But it's faster in other ways, too, like being better at focusing, especially in low light situations (i.e., it's better at finding focus, so I spend less time playing with the focus point location). Those things are only a few seconds per shot, but that does add up over the course of a shoot; even a few minutes of buffer can really help if traffic or other issues interfere with my schedule.

I think my wife was a little annoyed with me this week. I have a 24-70 2.8 and a 70-200 2.8, both in F mount, so I brought the D750 and have been using the 24-70 on that body, while the 14-24 Z has stayed on the Z8. There have been times I've been swapping between cameras, and at one point, I had both slung around my neck. Hey, it's nice not having to swap lenses around and worry about the FTZ adapter.

View original on lemmy.world
feddit.nl

Nice photo! Gear can really make a difference. I have both M43 mirrorless cameras (Olympus E-M5 mark 2 as primary) and Canon DSLRs (Canon 5D mark 2 as primary). Both of them have their moments. I really enjoy shooting with a DSLR more in many cases, but there's a time and a place for that. Sometimes having the features and low weight of the E-M5.2 make much more sense.

Honestly I keep flipflopping between them, so I just keep them both, despite it being a bit annoying to be invested in 2 systems.

1

My wife has an older Olympus mirrorless. I think it's an OM-D, or something like that. The wifi broke and won't work, which is apparently a common issue with that model. Also it got dropped at one point, so the screen is cracked. Still takes pictures just fine though.

I remember not really liking it the few times I tried it, but that may have just been me not being used to the mirrorless design. I briefly tested it the other day, and it seemed fine.

I'll stick with Nikon, though!

2

You reached the end

Photography is fun again | Spyke