Neo-Nazi group challenges hate ban by arguing law ‘operates as a doorway to tyranny’
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/may/18/neo-nazi-group-national-socialist-network-white-australia-challenges-hate-ban-ntwnfbOpen linkView original on lemmy.ziphttps://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/may/18/neo-nazi-group-national-socialist-network-white-australia-challenges-hate-ban-ntwnfbOpen linkView original on lemmy.zip
trying to dictate who we fuck
complains about tyranny
behold the master race
"Tyanny for thee, not for me."
Nazis don't have a place at the bar
This is just advertising for them. Why even report on this.
This.
Share it where needed: https://thewhiterosesociety.writeas.com/9-principles-for-journalists-reporting-on-neo-nazis
See also: https://aussie.zone/post/32699745
Those who put together the principles for journalists document are really worthy of respect. Thank you for sharing.
Thanks!
I can’t see them winning, sounds absurd prospect.
If they did it be major trouble and possible referendum
From 2025, but it seems his lawyer isn't without controversy of his own ...
::: spoiler Thragg looking motherfucker :::
Paradox of Tolerance. The Intolerant aren't owed the tolerance of a civil society. You can't break as well as quote the social contract.
We're eventually going to have to do the same thing to MAGA in America. Don't ban them for hate speech, ban them for being a National Security Threat. That sticks, and doesn't violate free speech laws. You wouldn't let ISIS operate freely, would you?
The law at minimum stops chaos.
and maybe these nazis should think of their duty as citizens to make this a better place rather than spreading hate and whining about their freedumbs