'Really, really weird': Physicists entangle two moving atoms for the first time, validating 'spooky' quantum theory
https://www.livescience.com/physics-mathematics/quantum-physics/really-really-weird-physicists-entangle-two-moving-atoms-for-the-first-time-validating-spooky-quantum-theoryOpen linkView original on mander.xyz
That's what I was going to suggest.
Sounds like 1950s scifi B movie jargon.
Related
Classic
Doesn't all physics lingo?
Yeah, actually ๐ค. I heard the phrase "quantum magnetometry" not too long ago and it sounded made up as hell, along with the device using it and what it can do (it's a heartbeat sensor that csn detect a heart beat several kilometers away).
Shit's real.
Damn. When the robots take over, we are so fucked.
It's already pretty scary; it's a CIA/NSA tool.
Just learn to stop your heart at will. ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Quantum radar is fun!
Isnโt there no real evidence such a device exists or could even work theoretically?
That's from the Veritasium video, right? I remember that they mentioned that there isn't any evidence for such a device and it is likely impossible at such a large distance. Evidence the technology does exist, but only at very short distances in ideal conditions.
The turboencabularor was busy
Wait photons don't interact with gravity at all? It is just that the warping of spacetime by gravity effects light indirectly?
Photons do have energy (in the stress-energy tensor), so they curve spacetime too, but all particles follow geodesics regardless of mass...so...I guess it is all the same from gravity's PoV...it is QM that makes a difference...but entanglement doesn't either (like gravity)...wink wink, nudge nudge...
PS: ok, ok, radiation's energy density is 1/aโด and baryons is 1/aยณ, so there is a distinction there to having inertia towards gravity.
the actual paper https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69070-3