Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on feddit.online

23 replies

ani.social

No, in most countries it works fine without it.

6
feddit.online

You should see the heavily armed atmosphere at my place, tomorrow being the general elections for us. I live in the World's Largest Democracy.

0
remonreply
ani.social

I don't think I've ever seen police or any security when I voting. Unless the the old lady that checks your ID counts.

5
lemmy.world

World's Largest Democracy.

By headcount. The US is still the largest by mass.

4
lemmy.world

As I love to say to my fellow Americans: "Land doesn't vote." It's the mass of the people that matters.

Do you think Canada outweighs the US?

1
micekreply
feddit.nu

Well I've heard rumors that Utah and California has about equal amounts of votes, land doesn't vore? Please tell me I'm wrong!

1

You're wrong for the Senate, right for the house and electoral college. But for the Senate, representation is not based on population, so Wyoming for example has outsized influence.

1
kbalreply
fedia.io

He's probably including the mass of the land.

1
feddit.nu

Funny that people are calling it a democracy where people are voting for a person that kinda will maybe vote for one of two men but maybe not and then someone after the voting redraws the voting districts so the "right" one wins... How bad have I misunderstood the american voting system?

2
micekreply
feddit.nu

I was thinking of the system in USA, which is not uncommonly called a democracy, but it feels weird to me as the voters are so far removed from the actual election of leadership. And as stated, I suspect I've missed some parts there. India on the other hand, as I suspect yo're referring to (because I've heard "worlds largest democracy" about it earlier) I'm even more lost but still curious, are there much protests or other kind of upset gatherings around the elections?

2

You reached the end