Spyke

You'll need to hang the whole congress, the senate, the white house, a good portion of the supreme court and several thousands more just to start with the heads of all this.

Then we can talk about how to purge your population.

122
minorkeysreply
lemmy.world

And the CEO's and tech leaders and investment firms who finance and profit from all of this.

45

Some should be much further up on the list. They are as key to this as Turmpa himself.

11
teyrnonreply
sh.itjust.works

Obviously them, arms contractor's ceo's, oil ceo's. Hedge fund and private equity bosses just because.

9
prolereply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

My representative in Congress has been against this at every turn, vocally so. I don't think she deserves to hang.

8
Sunflierreply
lemmy.world

Well, we need more Justice Dems like her, Illhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Pramila Jayapaul, Cori Bush, and Bernie Sanders

1

Wanna trade? Mine toes the line while talking to us about trivial, insignificant bills he’s sponsoring

1

Brother I would vote for you in a general election on literally just this platform alone

6

That would be a decent start.

In a perfect world everyone that voted for Trump would also get a 1 year prison sentence.

1
lemmy.world

Officers who commit war crimes CANNOT be let off the hook if we end this madness. They are required to refuse illegal orders, and they should be held to account.

We can no longer afford to let people off in the name of national healing. Anyone complicit in these crimes must be severely punished - otherwise we're just sending a message to future despots that there's no risk to pursuit of their goals.

57

I'm totally convinced that most people are selfish and lazy pieces of shit with no morals, so I won't hold my breath. What's holding these idiots back in the past was an accessibility issue, which is now lifted. They are actually the majority. I'm preparing to be ruled by absolute dogshit morons who may at any moment become pedophilic mass murderers.

1
lemmy.world

May? May???

There is no may! Everyone of those fuckers who thinks they can hide behind "I was only following orders" can be charged with war crimes and executed for all I care. Following orders when you KNOW they are illegal and KNOW they are reprehensible beyond all belief...? You think you deserve to be absolved? Nah fuck you.

29

You are reacting to the headline not the quote.

“I’m old enough to remember the Nuremberg trials and how we’ve held the Germans accountable after… the atrocities they committed during World War II,” Brigadier General Steve Anderson told CNN Tuesday.

“And I’d hate to think… five, 10 years from now, we’d be doing the same kind of thing with American soldiers and leaders that made decisions that were being directed by the president of the United States that are illegal.”

1

When writing or calling my reps I've started opening with "We will hold you criminally accountable for enabling Trump's war crimes."

When I actually get a human, I tell them they need to find a new job as they will also be considered part of the conspiracy.

25

Not "might", "must", and for all the things, from the Supreme Court's corruption to the corporate sponsorship of all the crime and genocide.

14

You are reacting to the headline not the quote.

“I’m old enough to remember the Nuremberg trials and how we’ve held the Germans accountable after… the atrocities they committed during World War II,” Brigadier General Steve Anderson told CNN Tuesday.

“And I’d hate to think… five, 10 years from now, we’d be doing the same kind of thing with American soldiers and leaders that made decisions that were being directed by the president of the United States that are illegal.”

1

Not to be overly depressive and cynical but the Nuremberg trials were, in practice, show trials and very few people were actually held accountable.

12
_stranger_reply
lemmy.world

The show was the important part. The trials put the crimes on display for the world, essentially as a deterrent. And it kinda sorta worked for almost a hundred years! Too bad we apparently have to relearn this lesson every so often.

15

Well there was a minor oversight where most got away scot-free anyway, and if you didn't lose you weren't accused.

1

what I hear you saying is that the USA has the opportunity to do the best Nuremberg trials in history, better than anyone's ever heard of before

3

Wow actually!

Only 24 people charged/convicted. 10 executed. 1 an heroed themself. 1 wasn't even present.

Argentina really did them a solid.

2

You're suggesting we just ignore everything, pretend everything is fine, and just move on?

I'm sure if I ignore it, the cancer I was just diagnosed with will go away!

-Literally no cancer patient ever

0
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I'm by no means pro Israel but shouldn't this rhetoric of dissolving states also be applied to brutally violent imperialist countries like the US too, or pretty much any state for that matter? Not meaning to be inflammatory, it's a sincere question.

-3

I understand your point. But Israel has been founded on brutality and genocide. They've just keep doing what they're song today since it's creation. The whole idea is to cleanse the area of any non Jewish people. They truly believe they are a supreme race chosen by God and that this land is their God given right. You can't save a state that had that kind of history and mentality.

The U.S. can be salvaged. It hasn't always been a bad state. And it's people aren't all bloodthirsty killers like Israel.

0

As I understand it, there was only one criminal. His name was Jeffery Epstein. We got him. He's gone now. Stop talking about it.

-4
lemmy.ca

trump is affecting the globe with his unhinged behaviour so if there truly is an international court, and global law is a thing, then yes, retributon should be swift.

11
lemmy.ca

Oh I agree, but let's not be too hasty at the final stage. I believe the orange cum rag has more than earned a slow and painful demise.

2
thelemmy.club

For the US and Israel to truly experience this "Nuremberg" like trials you speak off, they have to lose the war. Germany did not win their wars nor was it a German judiciary that tried the cases.

7

they have to lose the war

Germany didn't de-Nazify after they lost the war. German Nazis continued to hold ranking positions in both East and West Germany and in their imperial industrial sectors (CIA and Stasi were both stuffed with former Nazis). One of the kinder things you could say about the Soviets was that they stuck Nazi captives in low-ranking grunt work positions and ran them to death. Similarly, the US turned a lot of ex-Nazis into Expendables style special forces and deep cover insurgent forces in missions that ended disastrously.

But we had Adolf Heusinger running NATO. We had ex-SS officers all over the East German Police. Werner Von Braun was running NASA. Klaus Barbie, Alois Brunner, Josef Mengele all successfully exfilitrated to South America and the Middle East, thanks to Allen Dulles's ratlines and the fascists in the 1940s Catholic Church. Postwar West Germany, in particular, was littered with mid-level ex-fascists and latter-day turncoats.

Nevermind the foreign sponsors of German Nazis - the Bush Family, the Ford Family, IBM's Watson Family, the Carnegies, the Morgans, the Duke of fucking Windsor. They all got richer for their trouble, even before guys like Eisenhower and Churchill vacuumed them all up into their orbit.

Nuremberg was show trials for a handful of surviving high profile belligerents. A Limited Hangout, as Nixon would eventually describe it. Fascism never died. It simply got rebranded under the Cold War.

3
ltxrtquqreply
lemmy.ml

I don't think there are a lot of military members in the Epstein files, so I think they'd use different court systems.

3
lemmy.zip

It’s not going to come from within. The only way it’s going to happen at this point is for the US to be invaded and deposed as a whole, with leadership captured and held accountable. And well, I’m not taking any bets on that happening.

6

The United States' economy depends on the goodwill of the world. Without their control of the international reserve currency it would utterly collapse. If that were to happen then the rest of the world would be in a strong position to make demands of the United States.

However, over the last few decades most western economies have become so entwined with America that a US collapse would take them down as well. Efforts have been made in the last few months to reduce those entanglements, but there's still a long way to go. If you want justice to be brought to America then the best thing you could do is boycott US goods and service whenever possible.

5
lemmy.ca

lol the lack of balls on some people

say it like you mean it. it's a requirement.

4
Canacondareply
lemmy.ca

You are reacting to the headline not the quote.

“I’m old enough to remember the Nuremberg trials and how we’ve held the Germans accountable after… the atrocities they committed during World War II,” Brigadier General Steve Anderson told CNN Tuesday.

“And I’d hate to think… five, 10 years from now, we’d be doing the same kind of thing with American soldiers and leaders that made decisions that were being directed by the president of the United States that are illegal.”

4

yes, because the headline is supposed to accurately reflect the contents

0
Gathorallreply
lemmy.world

Would hate to see justice done? Or does he imply US forces have done nothing wrong so far?

-2
Canacondareply
lemmy.ca

Is that the only 2 possible solutions your brain can conclude? Think harder.

4
Gathorallreply
lemmy.world

Those are the options. If war crimes have been committed by now trials are the only path to justice. Therefore he either believes no war crimes have been committed, or he is a defender of injustice and American exceptionalism.

-1
Canacondareply
lemmy.ca

He's a retired general. And you're a fucking idiot.

2
Gathorallreply
lemmy.world

Yes, he has the credentials and the thought pattern of a champion of American imperialism.

-1

cerntainly. this is why the republican party must go. after nixon they decided to never call their members to task and this shows they will allow them to go to any and all extents.

3

I feel as though half of MAGA would regret their vote if someone filmed and handed trump an unchambered weapon and asked him to crack off a round down a range.

2
midwest.social

“If he were to do that… it would be the commitment of a great war crime.”

“Great” and “war crime” probably should not be in the same sentence. Especially adjacent to each other

0

To be fair as it's meant is pretty bad too.

Like can't we draw the line at normal war crimes? (/s?)

3

Yes, I understand it would be an awesome war crime

And nothing about that phrasing in modern parlance sounds odd whatsoever

-1

Alexander the Great wasn't called as such because he was chill. Neither was Ivan the Terrible bad at his job

1
sh.itjust.works

Oh, are we going to pass the unicorn protection act next? Protect bigfoot's habitat? Give me a break. Idk why anyone would give thrift to this general that I presume is trying to play the good hearted here. But they are playing you.

-2

International law means nothing to the US. They would sooner bomb the ICC than see one of their people or Israel's get prosecuted. Debating what is against international law is strictly academic in this context, a waste of time, and is already beyond dispute they've violated it in more ways we can recount. With no consequence, and there will be no consequence.

3