Spyke
augmented_reality·Augmented Reality (AR)by73ms

Translation feature comparison between 6 display smart glasses (video)

The video reviews both the visual translation (looking at text) as well as live transcription features of different smart glasses. There's some through the lens footage for all of them.

The following glasses are included: Meta Ray-Ban display glasses Rokid Glasses RayNeo X3 Pro Even Realities G2 Inmo Air3 Inmo Go3

View original on sopuli.xyz
sopuli.xyz

Not sure why all the downvotes in this almost unused community. I thought it was interesting to see glimpses of the various displays. For most of these glasses there's clearly a lot of work to be done on usability since the process of using these features is far too involved for everyday use.

2
Austerreply
thebrainbin.org

Not sure why all the downvotes in this almost unused community.

People seem very trigger-happy about anything that could risk privacy. Also wouldn't doubt some ill-intended people follow the community just to downvote it.

2
73msreply
sopuli.xyz

You're probably right. Just seems almost every post in an AR community is going to have some privacy implications considering that cameras are very rarely not involved and this video doesn't detail anything especially serious when it comes to those.

2
lemmy.world

The xreal air 1 proved you can do a lot with AR without cameras. I wish companies would focus on maturing those use cases and make cameraless devices mainstream.

1
73msreply
sopuli.xyz

Not sure what those glasses in particular have that other display glasses don't, but in the context of AR cameras are just basically inevitable as we progress towards more advanced devices since they're the only way to do 6dof tracking anywhere and you need a model of the world to do much.

1

I think we can do a lot of useful things with just 3dof. Those glasses had great head tracking without cameras.

1

You reached the end

Translation feature comparison between 6 display smart glasses (video) | Spyke