Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

14 replies

mitramreply
sopuli.xyz

It's honestly better to do it with a printer that can't be connected to you so easily.

Some printers leave imperceptible identifiers on the paper that can later be used to track what printer was used and might lead to identifying the buyer.

13
Wilcoreply
lemmy.zip

So what if they do? It is a fact that Trump is in the files.

6

Not contesting that, but at some point in time announcing that the sun is in the center of our solar system would have you barbecued.

4
Pmanreply
lemmy.org

Legally all printers do since the mid 90's

2
mitramreply
sopuli.xyz

Aren't you thinking of US law?

Not sure if most countries do the same.

2

It really doesn't matter as most printer production is made in countries that want to sell to the US if not located there and I have yet to find a government who won't use any excuse to add state espionage tools they can use and blame on others. The US initially said it was to stop counterfeit currency production, that and the constellation QR type thing that stops printers from replicating the item in question does that, but fingerprinting all printers not only identifies the machine and most likely who used it but also is a great way to force people to start cutting out news papers again if they want to be anonymous in their letters asking for ransoms.

2

Donny couldn't rise until Savile had set. Why do we wordhip these fucks? And yes, even those who hate this shit allow it by not calling it out immediately. We worship people who get away with murder...

12

You reached the end