Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on piefed.world

14 replies

cadekatreply
pawb.social

I dunno... It could be 100.01% if extra bones are more common?

5
rkw_socialreply
lemmy.ca

I'm gonna guess that amputations are more common than having extra bones. Especially given the world we live in

13
rbnreply
sopuli.xyz

Before we clarify the average, we must define what an entire skeleton means. If some people have 'extra' bones - who says that this isn't the baseline and the majority is lacking some?

3

Good point, but according to the article the extra bones provide no additional function and just cause pain. I'd say that well qualifies as being extra

1
pawb.social

Technically, the average human body contains slightly less than enough bones to make an entire skeleton.

Because, after all, the average human has slightly less than 2 legs and slightly less than 2 arms.

14
midwest.social

Two eyes, two ears, a chin, a mouth, ten fingers, two nipples. A butt, two kneecaps, a penis…

I have just described to you the Loch Ness Monster. And the reward for its capture? All the riches in Scotland. So I have only one question: Why are you here?

1

I have just described to you the Loch Ness Monster.

As if.

Everybody knows the Nessie has 6 nipples.

1

You reached the end

Spooky season never stops | Spyke