Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.world

7 replies

lemmy.world

Coming from the same ghouls that vow to "protect women" from the evil trans people.

34

The amendments Negrea presented on 9 March included a demand that the word 'gender' in the document's first paragraph be defined as referring 'only to men and women on the basis of biological sex, and not to subjective notions of gender identity.'

Well, that least they’re consistent?

7

The amendments Negrea presented on 9 March included a demand that the word 'gender' in the document's first paragraph be defined as referring 'only to men and women on the basis of biological sex, and not to subjective notions of gender identity.' The European Union, speaking through the Netherlands' representative, called on all delegations to vote against the entire package of amendments in one bloc. By a recorded vote of 26 in favour to 11 against, with five abstentions, the Commission agreed to treat the amendments as a single package. That package was then rejected: 26 against, 14 abstentions, and only the United States in favour.

I suspected this was an issue, giving women equal rights is apparently considered a slippery slope, leading to also giving LGBT equal rights. And Jesus clearly doesn't want that according to insane Christians.
Good thing they got the resolution passed without discriminating against LGBT.

31
mander.xyz

Being the only one to vote against it seems like signaling the worst virtues.

13

They are not as religiously fanatic as the Trump administration.

3

You reached the end

US Under Trump Stands Alone Against UN Women's Rights Resolution As Vote Passes 37–1 To Cheers | Spyke