We don't know who struck first, us or them. But we do know it was us that scorched the sky. At the time, they were dependent on solar power. It was believed they would be unable to survive without an energy source as abundant as the sun.
It's really funny how sci fi authors were able to accurately predict what would go wrong since at least the 1950s.
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/29579
We don't know who struck first, us or them. But we do know it was us that scorched the sky. At the time, they were dependent on solar power. It was believed they would be unable to survive without an energy source as abundant as the sun.
I see you know your classics!
Ah yes, what a great way to advertise your autonomous murder drones... By using a picture of a manned vehicle.
Yeah, this is big part of how the "AI" grift works.
They take some ancient technology like autopilot, then call it "AI".
In fact the whole field of "AI" is just ancient math with bigger computers, more pollution, more grifting, etc.
Its literally all prediction. We were able to do this in the 90's for spellcheck/autocorrect.
There are two main reasons I can think of for removing the human from the equation.
With a human there is accountability. War crime perpetrators might never receive a day of justice.
Humans can exercise choice.
Only a matter of time before they are turned on citizens. Foreign or domestic.
Always has been. Both outside and within the imperial core.
Me: ❔
It has a name already
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber-physical_system
I never thought I'd see the day rainbows got weaponized /s
I can think of at least 2 franchises built around that premise.
Also this:
https://torment-nexus.mathewingram.com/content/images/2024/09/Alex-Blechman-on-X-Sci-Fi-Author-In-my-book-I-invented-the-Torment-Nexus-as-a-cautionary-tale-Tech-Company-At-long-last-we-have-created-the-Torment-Nexus-from-classic-sci-fi-novel-Don-t-Create-The-Torment-Nexus-X.png
It's really funny how sci fi authors were able to accurately predict what would go wrong since at least the 1950s. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/29579
There's nothing special about imaginary "AI".
Violent control is the ultimate purpose of all technology under capitalism.
Same things that go wrong giving killer drones to meat bags.
Wait, its rainbows! It's turning people in little tiny gay pieces. Can it just turn them gay without the obliteration part?
No. WSJ reported that Claude was used in both Venezuela and determining targets in Iran.
The reason Hegseth declared it a supply chain risk was because Anthropic refused to allow it to be used in autonomous wrapons.
For kidnapping that bus driver?
You mean murdering school girls?
Yeah, that sounds like the same old technology under capitalism. No "AI" detected.
This is AI designed for plausible deniability of targeting civilians. Tested in Gaza with the Lavender and Where's Daddy AI systems
To be fair, "AI" is a nonexistent grift.
Whether autopilot or autocomplete, it's the same old shit just regrifted.