Spyke
asklemmy·Ask Lemmybyhappydoors

Are there modern plug-in-play in the modern age?

My friend is a camera operator and is looking to take two SSDs together for a portable raid. AFAIK modern raid like that is an old school approach. I recommended he set up a little server or the easy way out and just look for a JBOD enclosure. Am I wrong? Are there trustworthy enclosures that handle the raid without much set-up today?

View original on lemmy.world

Plug and play. You plug it in and it starts playing immediately, no more set up necessary!

3

Plug and play

Plug 'n play (or even PNP) is also acceptable, and is likely what you heard before

3
sh.itjust.works

I seem to be one of the last defenders of hardware RAID, and even I think a portable raid is the wrong approach here.

Which platform is he on? Is ZFS an option?

7
happydoorsreply
lemmy.world

His personal system is MacOS but I know he works on windows at work. I believe ZFS is an option. I guess, the easier the better. Something that isn’t a ginormous project. I suggested a home server with Truenas, just because that’s what I have. I don’t want to send him down that route if there is an easy option he can just buy and go and be satisfied he met at least RAID 1 safety net.

2
neidu3reply
sh.itjust.works

Whenever I hear MacOS, just assume complete and utter incompetence on my part. I still don't know how to right click to open a context menu.

But for a more general approach, how portable does it have to be, and how much storage would be ideal? A few TB, or are we talking about PB?

2

Personally, I'd have some sort of enclosure that could also house a raspberry pi and similar, which mounts those disks in ZFS and shares them via NFS. That'd ensure compatibility with any OS, but it might be overkill.

1
Estebiureply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Why use hardware raid instead of software based raid ? Am i missing something ?

1
neidu3reply
sh.itjust.works

Large scale performance. My job involves obscene amounts of storage, and nothing beats a proper raid controller with cache vault. When clustering many storage nodes into one big filesystem, across several machines, any overhead is awful.

On a hobby-level I don't mind software raid. I just don't want to put it into production.

1
lemmy.world

From one hobbyist to another, I've got an absolutely ancient second gen 4-bay Drobo that works fine, but really needs to be replaced with a proper NAS configuration. Do you have any recommendations for a more modern four drive setup that wouldn't break the bank?

1

As long as you have the ram to run it, I find that ZFS covers most of my needs unless I am dealing with something that necessitates beegfs. My basement server has 12 drives in JBOD, tied together with ZFS, and it works fine.

2
tal
lemmy.today

The post doesn't really say what the goal is, which makes it hard to answer the question.

  • Redundancy to improve storage reliability?

  • Higher bandwidth?

  • Something that can be presented to the camera or a computer as a larger single disk?

3

Thanks. It’s intimidating writing a post and what’s unnecessary info. Here’s some more! He deals with high resolution video and photos so speed and higher bandwidth is definitely a priority. Upon speaking to him he seemed to have a natural interest in a raid 1 or more option. I think this is just from surface skimming reading. I know he has 2 disks now ready to go. I think his ideal world is a disk that shows up on various computers as a single disk. He works probably 50/50 MacOS and Windows.

He is not IT tech literate but is certainly capable of learning and taking extra steps or guides, if necessary.

2

You can get a hardware-mirrored external USB3.0 drive with 6TB usable (12TB raw) for under $175 from NewEgg/Western Digital

Just plug it in and it works

2

You reached the end