Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on piefed.social

12 replies

lemmy.blahaj.zone

So people paid Google 60 bucks to buy a wiretap for their house, now for evesdropping they get 10 back. These lawsuits in the US are nonsense

38

Just add the ad and gov revenue streams and I’d say this is a wonderful deal. For Google.

13
lemmy.world

Still haven't seen a lick of evidence this actually happenes. Just shakedown law suits.

-8

IIRC from the Apple lawsuit, though I may be wrong, the issue wasn’t that they were like, always listening. The issue was that it was overly sensitive to trigger words and would sometimes activate and listen when it wasn’t supposed to. I can believe this, because even now the stupid thing will sometimes activate when I didn’t want it to, but NOW it’s very obvious that it has activated, whereas before it wasn’t as obvious.

5
CallMeAnAIreply
lemmy.world

Naw your and the medias screeching is basically the UAC prompt and why nobody takes is seriously 🤷‍♂️. 

-3

You reached the end

Google to pay $68 million because its voice assistant eavesdropped on us | Spyke