It is his mouth, which doesn't exist. Like drawing Voldemort with a nose.
In addition to fucking up the character it also fucked up the standing in a line and facing off to the side theme by having Dilbert stare into the camera.
Hey, though, it did have Trump staring off into space while Vance and Dilbert look at the camera (albeit the former looks like he's begging the photographer through clenched teeth to take the shot before he shits his pants). So it did capture some of that dementia.
Edit: Wait, I just noticed that there's something obstructing the frame in the bottom right. Whyyyyyyyy? Like I understand why the GPT did this, but how did they think this was acceptable?
It's the mouth. He doesn't have one. Ever. This is extraordinarily consistent. I have rarely seen a strip where Dilbert visibly emotes (let alone happily), and never one where he has a mouth for that. I almost can't even find something stupid enough to compare this to. It's like Mario with a shaved mustache, except even worse because of how integral Dilbert's lack of a mouth is to his characterization as somebody who's never listened to.
Edit: Just to clarify, I'm excluding the 1999–2000 TV sitcom. You can't make your main character mouthless without severe drawbacks when you have to animate and voice him; it's practically a necessary compromise. Even then, from what little I remember of the show, he was never beaming like this.
It is his mouth, which doesn't exist. Like drawing Voldemort with a nose.
In addition to fucking up the character it also fucked up the standing in a line and facing off to the side theme by having Dilbert stare into the camera.
The ‘99-00 cartoons gave him a mouth, but I think they disappeared it when he wasn’t talking.
I was thinking the exact same thing
So via in universe canon this is actually a photo in the middle of him talking to Trump and Vance?
Maybe he's just smiling for a photo. It's hard to show that he's smiling without a drawing a mouth, I suppose
Hey, though, it did have Trump staring off into space while Vance and Dilbert look at the camera (albeit the former looks like he's begging the photographer through clenched teeth to take the shot before he shits his pants). So it did capture some of that dementia.
Edit: Wait, I just noticed that there's something obstructing the frame in the bottom right. Whyyyyyyyy? Like I understand why the GPT did this, but how did they think this was acceptable?
So after all they have posted, this is what you expected them to be unacceptable??
Any reference on Voldemort's nose from the books? In the movies, he didn't look at all like I had imagined him but I might have overlooked something
Dilbert looks like a fucking horror character.
Also I love how he's in the background of a tribute to his own creator, as if Vance and Trump are like "Look at us, we're more important!"
Scott Adams died? Well, good for him, he stopped being a shitty person.
Scott Adams died and Dibert finally smiled
I'm not quite familiar enough with Dilbert to be able to tell which "defining detail" was fucked up. Any hints?
It's the mouth. He doesn't have one. Ever. This is extraordinarily consistent. I have rarely seen a strip where Dilbert visibly emotes (let alone happily), and never one where he has a mouth for that. I almost can't even find something stupid enough to compare this to. It's like Mario with a shaved mustache, except even worse because of how integral Dilbert's lack of a mouth is to his characterization as somebody who's never listened to.
Edit: Just to clarify, I'm excluding the 1999–2000 TV sitcom. You can't make your main character mouthless without severe drawbacks when you have to animate and voice him; it's practically a necessary compromise. Even then, from what little I remember of the show, he was never beaming like this.
Ah yeah that solves it quite definitively, thanks.
after a quick glance at some other dilbert images, I think it's the mouth? it seems like the "real" one doesn't have a mouth
Maybe his mouth? Idk man.
Wait...is this how I'm learning that another conservative asshole died?
Yup
This Lemmy post is, however, an excellent way to find out about it. Thanks!
Shouldn't he be standing next to Charlie Kirk?
Nobody should be standing next to Charlie Kirk
That's a dangerous spot to stand.
I don't know, graveyards seem pretty safe.
Not to mention, you'd have the perfect urinal right there with you!
Bottom right is a GPT hallucination of a Trump supporter dabbing at one of his rallies.
SMBC did a better dilbert
https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/requiem-for-a-dil
I get that Dilbert's tie is suppose to be an intentional phallic symbol, but AI got it all going extra today.
Did he ever helped him to get the experimental drug Adams was pleading him to help with?
I wonder what Adams would've thought of receiving this epitaph, say, a decade ago.
lmao, good riddance