I feel this so much. I started doing a rewrite of a plugin wanting to understand how it does its work and the real bottleneck is not knowing what's being done, not how to write it down
I've long maintained that actually writing code is only a small part of the job. Understanding the code that exists and knowing what code to write is 90% of it.
I don't personally feel that gen AI has a place in my work, because I think about the code as I'm writing it. By the time I have a complete enough understanding of what I want the code to do in order to write it into a prompt, the work is already mostly done, and banging out the code that remains and seeing it come to life is just pure catharsis.
The idea of having to hand-hold an LLM through figuring out the solution itself just doesn't sound fun to me. If I had to do that, I'd rather be teaching an actual human to do it.
Is the only logical followup, and I highly doubt someone who names a blog after themselves is that aware. So I didn't bother clicking to see what bullshit output from a chatbot he posted
-4
“Because of GenAI, coding is no longer the bottleneck” | Spyke
Sharing this from the article to hopefully save the post a few downvotes:
Thank you! I've added the image to the post as well.
Kind of on the author for giving the article a clickbaity title.
Agree with the author — “specification driven development” is like saying cold ice cream is the hot new thing.
I feel this so much. I started doing a rewrite of a plugin wanting to understand how it does its work and the real bottleneck is not knowing what's being done, not how to write it down
I've long maintained that actually writing code is only a small part of the job. Understanding the code that exists and knowing what code to write is 90% of it.
I don't personally feel that gen AI has a place in my work, because I think about the code as I'm writing it. By the time I have a complete enough understanding of what I want the code to do in order to write it into a prompt, the work is already mostly done, and banging out the code that remains and seeing it come to life is just pure catharsis.
The idea of having to hand-hold an LLM through figuring out the solution itself just doesn't sound fun to me. If I had to do that, I'd rather be teaching an actual human to do it.
The new bottleneck is reviewing the generated slop.
Well now writing/reviewing the code really is the bottleneck.
I meant reviewing the code generated by coworkers 🫤
So not really any materially different from 10 years ago?
Oh I know, I was agreeing with you! I obviously wasn’t clear though based on my number of upvotes.
Just seems funny
Was writing code the bottleneck before? Or was it planning, alignment, learning, iteration, testing, etc?
I can hand write a lot very fast, but it only had value when I do the above.
That's exactly what the article is about. Please read it, it's good.
You caught me reacting to the headline without reading it. I will check it out.
Real title: Coding has never been the bottleneck
Is this bot broken?
Is the only logical followup, and I highly doubt someone who names a blog after themselves is that aware. So I didn't bother clicking to see what bullshit output from a chatbot he posted