Justice Department begins releasing long-awaited files tied to Epstein sex trafficking investigation

https://apnews.com/article/release-epstein-files-justice-department-trump-f919d9dc9c3957cb2bd2c9c1a14b533cOpen link View original on lemmy.world

127

Comments16

MonkeyDumpster

lemmy.org

[redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] [redacted]

criss_cross reply

lemmy.world

There’s literally a 119 page grand jury testimony that’s fully redacted.

Over 90% of the docs are fully redacted.

Like Jesus talk about Malicious Compliance

EDIT: adding a link

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%203/EFTA00005586.pdf

meco03211 reply

lemmy.world

Except they aren't complying. They haven't released as much as they should have.

Gerudo reply

lemmy.zip

They were also only supposed to redeact victim information.

criss_cross reply

lemmy.world

True. There’s also supposed to be explanations for these and right now there’s jack shit.

monkeyslikebananas2 reply

lemmy.world

I think they have 15 days to provide explanations for the redactions.

Tolookah reply

discuss.tchncs.de

Each page has trump's name mentioned on it, all 119 pages. Several times per page

FreshParsnip reply

lemmy.ca

And when they don't.......nothing will be done about it

FreshParsnip reply

lemmy.ca

That's not malicious compliance, that's just noncompliance. Maybe it technically meets the definition of malicious compliance but I simply refuse to call it that