Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on mander.xyz

22 replies

lemmy.world

Yeah it's not that simple, wikipedia has a good summary:

Advocates of final destruction maintain that there is no longer any valid rationale for retaining the samples, which pose the hazard of escaping the laboratories, while opponents of destruction maintain that the samples may still be of value to scientific research, especially since variants of the smallpox virus may still exist in the natural world and thus present the possibility of the disease re-emerging in the future or being used as a bio-weapon.

104

Exactly, know your enemy, especially if you think you have defeated it.

We are about to see all the "defeated" diseases make a comeback due to politicians interfering in preventative healthcare. All in order to drive up revenue for big pharma and corporate healthcare from the increase in sick people.

31
marcosreply
lemmy.world

Keep the virus data in a computer where it can't escape from.

1
Warl0k3reply
lemmy.world

We're not to the point that that's possible.

3
marcosreply
lemmy.world

How big is its genome? There isn't much in a virus.

People can replicate a lot of them from purely data.

0

How many distinct genomes are there that we include under the label "smallpox"? It's also a great deal more complicated than simply storing the genome - much as gene expression in humans is more complicated than simply "this is what the DNA says", it's also more complicated than that for viruses. We're finally to the point that we can simulate interactions, but it's -absolutely- not a trivial thing to do (supercomputer shit) and simply saving the source material prevents any risk of loss of information.

6

It's actually very real machines, doing extremely well controlled chemical reactions, and no AI unless you count all computer software as AI (ok, processors have neural networks controlling them nowadays, so just "normal" amount of AI).

1
Warl0k3reply
lemmy.world

... Thanks, I guess? At least the very suspiciously bot-like accounts approve of me?

47
infosec.pub

This would kind of make sense if Isildur had taken the ring and tried to disassemble it and learn how its various magic effects worked, in order to extend life without the downsides.

The amount of things we've learned from the field of virology is fucking nuts.

64
burntbaconreply
discuss.tchncs.de

The name, the instance, and the commenting behavior all sort of add up to something odd. Then you take the specifics of each comment and how they just seem... bland and vague enough they could have been in reply to anything.

Just, for instance, look at the two comments made in this post.

27
Warl0k3reply
lemmy.world

Their comments never contribute anything to the posts, either. Very weird, most bots I see these days are a lot more convincing than this. Curious what's going on here. Maybe it's just performance art.

7

The author(s) may just be learning what the reactions are to the comments. Here for instance, the comment elicited downvotes. This may be used to teach a model to avoid the style of the comment

8
programming.dev

It would be horrible in real life but I thought a funny intro to a post apocalyptic movie would be a person giving a tour of a bio lab to college interns and...

"through our studies we have learned to increase the transmission rate and the death rate of the small pox virus. The downside is we had to mix it with rabies so the infected tend to get aggressive and lose there ability to rationalize their thoughts. Don't worry though, there is only this one vial of it in the entire world... these gloves are quite slippery.. Oops"

23

No I think it would be better in real life. To scare interns. Not actually develop the megapox.

8

You reached the end