Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on feddit.uk

15 replies

suppo.fi

Good that different EU bodies investigate these but for X this is just a cost of doing business unfortunately. They're not going to change anything.

25
TimeWalkerreply
piefed.foxden.party

Any DSA infringement in general never ends with just a fine. Businesses need to change to be compliant and must create an action plan with changes or else they risk continuous penalties as it says so in the press release:

Failure to comply with the non-compliance decision may lead to periodic penalty payments.

17

They might superficially change something to be "compliant" but otherwise continue to do business as usual.

3
HereIAmreply
lemmy.world

Is xitter actually making any money now? If it was any other large tech company I would agree, but Twitter always seemed to struggle to stay afloat. This isn't an endorsement of twitter, I wished this fine would be enough to bring them down.

1
piefed.social

Can we go back to saying X (formerly known as Twitter)? They so do notdeserve to claim a letter as their name.

8

I call it ex-Twitter. I think that makes it the most clear what it's supposed to be.

5

Why don't we discourage using X for all European citizens?

For the far-right users that still frequent it, we can just set up an alternative closed corner that is more moderate, populated by bots, and then have them go there, then cut off X altogether.

Then the algorithms will make them go more moderate.

And also,

Needs more zeros. Make it a €100 billion fine. If Twitter can't pay it, then Musk must pay it from his own personal wealth. Corruption poisons society, and society needs to purge corruption!

3

In fact, I quite like Twitter, even despite it is proprietary. But if it confines to violate our rules, it should be banned from EU.

0

You reached the end

Commission fines X €120 million under the Digital Services Act | Spyke