Spyke

That one is quite simple. On the sketch, you get

w+x+y+z=360º

Making the substitution with x+y=w+z, you get

w+w+z+z=360º <=> 2(w+z)=360º <=> w+z=180º

Proving AOB is a line, because the sketch provides, that w+z is an angle of AOB.

I am pretty sure, you were not asking for the proof, but I wanted to do it anyways. Does a genuine proof count as an anti meme?

108
f314reply
lemmy.world

As the teacher would tell you: read the entire problem before answering! (It says so in the problem)

51

isn't that already assuming that they are equal?

The problem asks us to make this assumption.

7
lemmy.world

But how do you know it's 360? If it wasnt a line, it could be 359.999 Or lets say 350, then w+z is 175.

The 360-ness you take is from the point of view where you already expect it to be a line.

-1
Muad'dibreply
sopuli.xyz

Because all the angles surrounding a point always add up to 360

14

You can also say that since ABC and D are all equally distant from O, so they all fall exactly on a circle with O as the center point.

1
lemmy.zip

It's a trick question. Question didn't say whether AOB is a straight line or a gay one

30

x + y + z + w = 360 because... Uh. I don't remember what the terms to use are but it does. It's a full circle. It's 4 points and 4 angles.

2 (x + y) = 360 because substitute x + y = z + w

x + y = 180 because you divide each side by 2

because x + y is 180, AOB is a line.

That's the best I can do. I may have forgotten a few steps about things you can't assume.

26
lemmy.ca

Maybe thee is an elegant way but

X+y+w+z=360°

Given X+y=w+z

Therefore we can sub X+y with w+z

(W+z)+(w+z)=360°

2(W+z)=360°

Divide both sides by 2

W+z=360°/2

W+z=180°

Straight lines are defined as having/being 180 angle

25
BCsvenreply
lemmy.ca

You have to show your work in snokenkeekaguard's class

3
feddit.nl

Did you not learn anything from your high school that's easy🥲

6

I did, but after 22 years I forgot how to solve algebra without being given at least 1 of the variables. 🥺

But also I still dont know how I would prove it's a line even if I got the x+y=w+z part. I could say 1+2=1+2. So 3. How is 3 a line? I have no idea. 3 is a number not a line. 😩

Unless... 3 is a squiggly line? 🤔

Edit: Bit disappointed nobody came to shit all over my math skills. Especially since halfway through typing the comment, I forgot the second half of the problem. 🤣

1

You do have a number, it's just not written down! It's that a full circle is 360 degrees

  • Let x + y = d and w + z = e for easier writing
  • We know d + e = 360 degrees (a full circle)
  • d = e, so 2d = 360, so d = 180 degrees
  • The angle AOB = d, and d = 180 degrees, so AB is a straight line

The actual maths is really easy, the bit that I assume is tripping you up is the realisation that you have more information than the words of the question

1
piefed.social

Just intuitively, it says they're equal, and the paired angles are adjacent. The only time two halves of a full circle have equal angles is half way.

5
programming.dev

I think this question is about making sure you state thinks in a formal manner. It is obvious, but you need to do state that as a mathematical proof.

7

You guys are all creative/smart. I would have held my ruler against the line and then traced around it with my pencil.

3

You reached the end