Spyke
Brave Little Hitachi Wandreply
feddit.uk

He looked about him, felt the air, looked deep within, and came to the clear realisation that what the people really deserve and crave in this political moment, is clarity and leadership on doing big cums

27
rozodru
piefed.social

yeah I'm sure THAT's the reason no one is having kids and not the fact that no one can afford to house said kids, or can afford to feed an extra mouth or two, or afford everything else thats involved in raising a child.

yeah, got it, the sperm count is down.

46
village604reply
adultswim.fan

I mean, sperm count is down and it is a problem. But it's not the reason people aren't having kids.

3
dugmeup
lemmy.world

Oh god. I don't want to know how he conducted this research.

34
FancyPantsFIREreply
lemmy.world

Visual, he can tell the you the sperm count of any individual at twenty yards with uncanny inaccuracy.

16
kreskinreply
lemmy.world

Hey now, RFK wasnt sucking them off exactly, he was testing to make sure they were circumsized, and that they had a healthy sperm count. He can also tell if the kids are healthy just by looking at them. Naked, obviously.

1
IHeartBadCode
fedia.io

When my uncle was president, the fertility rate in this country was 3.5%. Today, it is 1.6%. The replacement rate, in other words the amount of fertility that you need in order to keep your population even, is 2.1%. We are below replacement right now. That is a national security threat to our country and we know why this is happening, and President Trump is addressing the root causes through his MAHA agenda of reducing endocrine disruptors, the exposure to chemicals that decrease fertility.

You can't debate that. Mostly because it's just illogical altogether. It would like trying to convince someone that pasta doesn't taste like clay bricks. There's no logic to the initial argument, you can't logic that away.

26
Naichreply
lemmings.world

He's got a bit confused. It's the birth rate, and it's not a percent. You need a birth rate of 2.1 per person to keep the population steady. It's nothing to do with fertility, but more personal choices, like when a couple look around and think "nah, I'm not going to subject my kids to these fucking idiots".

27
Archerreply
lemmy.world

If I wasn’t already not having kids I definitely would have done it just to spite Paul Ryan

6
phutatoriusreply
lemmy.zip

Yeah. Leaving aside his getting the units wrong, he's interpreting the fertility rate as is it's a direct measure of sperm viability. There might be a causal connection between the two, but conflating them like RFKJ does is idiotic.

13
Eq0reply
literature.cafe

Is this AI generated? It seems like such a string of random elements… I can’t help but being impressed somehow. Like, wow, this pigeon really succeeded in shitting all over the chessboard!

7
masterofn001reply
lemmy.ca

How do you think they got the data?

(I'm sure it wasn't all just teenage girls)

11
WindyRebelreply
lemmy.world

Yeah, because if people aren’t fucking and producing kids then they lose labor and potential profits. They also lose the help of the youngsters to ensure that they have all the lovely care to make their passing as wonderful as it can be.

It’s fucked.

7
MedicsOfAnarchyreply
lemmy.world

Me, too. BUT, when we read an absolutely idiotic statement from NK, we had to ask, "Wait, did the translator get that right? Nobody is that stupid, right?"

This way cuts out the middle man. Yes, they absolutely are that stupid, no question.

6
kreskinreply
lemmy.world

Oh man, can you imagine how the US looks to the rest of the world right now? Open and rampant corruption, pedophilia, hyper religion, war crimes, and general idiocy. If I were them I'd be fleeing the dollar and not consuming any of our media. Our soft power is plummeting through the floor right now. We are the laughingstock of the planet.

1
tal
lemmy.today

When my uncle was president, the fertility rate in this country was 3.5%. Today, it is 1.6%. The replacement rate, in other words the amount of fertility that you need in order to keep your population even, is 2.1%. We are below replacement right now. That is a national security threat to our country and we know why this is happening, and President Trump is addressing the root causes through his MAHA agenda of reducing endocrine disruptors, the exposure to chemicals that decrease fertility.

Today, the average teenager in this country has 50% of the sperm count, 50% of the testosterone as a 65-year-old man

I very strongly doubt that the limiting factor on the total fertility rate is male infertility.

EDIT: Also, RFK, Jr., it's not "3.5%", "1.6%", and "2.1%". It's "3.5", "1.6", and "2.1", as in, children per woman. Okay, maybe that's being pedantic, but I'm also not the Secretary of Health and Human Services with speechwriters and a ton of experts advising me announcing focuses in national policy.

13
gedaliyahreply
lemmy.world

Today, the average teenager in this country has 50% of the sperm count, 50% of the testosterone as a 65-year-old man

Makes sense. The 65-year-old man is a man, while 50% of the teenagers are girls/women.

20
ABetterTomorrow
sh.itjust.works

I guess there’s your reason why people aren’t having kids. I guess should should start tackling the micro plastic problem first…

12
ScrumpyDumpleskin
lemmy.world
  1. He said the country is under birthing, its American duty to bring those numbers up.
  2. Younger generational males are too weak to take on the duty.
  3. Women are reaching fertility 6 years younger.
  4. Older men 65+ are better capable of doing duty.

There is a narrative here folks, and it's all sorts of wrong.

9
kreskinreply
lemmy.world

Who would want to make a kid in this right wing corrupt pedophiliac capitalist anti-environmentalist hellhole we're living in?

Sounds like child abuse even thinking about doing it.

1
Leather
lemmy.world

Given present circumstances I can't rule out this as astroturfing a justification for pedophelia to up birth rates.

2
Spacehooks
reddthat.com

Isn't the obvious answer because old men Are so unhealthy they cant get hard anymore vs teenage boys which keep their sperms levels down through rigorous activities?

1

You reached the end

RFK Jr. Warns Teenagers Now Have Less Sperm Than 65-Year-Old Men | Spyke