Security from the evil villains who want to block ads. Jesus would have wanted everyone to watch ads as god intended, and these degenerates need to be taken down.
I forgot about that, since Voyager doesn't display avatars. That's a transparent profile picture. I had problems deleting my old avatar, because avatar deletions didn't federate, back when I tried it. So I just uploaded a transparent png. Maybe I should upload a new avatar to avoid confusion.
Giant corporations, like billionaires, pivot to trying to control the rest of us when they get too big. Google/Alphabet is not exempt. I remember when their motto was "Don't be evil." Now they want to control what I can install on the personal devices I bought...
Oh yeah, it's bullshit that reduces user agency and choice either way, I just don't believe for one second that it will improve security as Google is claiming. Its just about control and google consolidating power.
That's actually good since bluetooth alone can be used to estimate your location. If the app can see all other bluetooth names, thet can be correlated to other user's data where the oosition is known.
And if you hit "pair new device", you phone will likely blast it's name out to all other bluetooth devices, givingyup it's position to any other nosy device/app.
The trouble with smaller open source software is that there's no 0.1% checking it. And from time to time a small projects becomes widely used and everyone assumes someone already checked it; it's a widely used open source software, after all.
I think most early users do check further than open source licenses. It's possible they'll add things later, but if they add after it has enough users we have significant number of users to have some people check. And if the user base is small then they're probably more involved, or are reading/modifying code for their use cases.
Of course it's not foolproof, but it has worked for a long time because of things like that
By definition in order to have . 1% then the sample size must be greater than 1,000. The vast majority of open source projects will not get to this level.
I don't find that shocking, and to be honest, I don't really see too much of a problem with forcing people to give that information to be on the play store. But to let people make programs that run on the hardware at all is crazy. Forbidding third party app stores is the most anti competitive bullshit ever.
I'm almost certain that rooting is going to come back with a vengeance and we'll be doing ever so slightly more complicated workarounds. Fuck Google. I refuse to watch a YouTube ad or sponsor unless I directly consent to supporting that individual creator.
Essentially saying we'll just 'install' piracy, as FitGirl is a major player in the piracy scene (as far as games go, no clue if they do other things).
Unless I'm wrong and Fitgirl now has repacks for major android/iOS apps that can be utilized through an existing app interface.
This was supposed to be taken down, but I guess its a proof how you can passively promote piracy on to the play store. This app shows a list of games that have been cracked & repacked
for "security"
security of our bottom line!
Security from the evil villains who want to block ads. Jesus would have wanted everyone to watch ads as god intended, and these degenerates need to be taken down.
AMEN!🙏🙏🙏
This crucification is sponsored by Nord VPN
Did you incorporate whitespace into your username? How fascinating.
I forgot about that, since Voyager doesn't display avatars. That's a transparent profile picture. I had problems deleting my old avatar, because avatar deletions didn't federate, back when I tried it. So I just uploaded a transparent png. Maybe I should upload a new avatar to avoid confusion.
No need on my behalf, but it's good to have an explanation. Thanks!
edit: s/got/good/
the securities of shareholders
Giant corporations, like billionaires, pivot to trying to control the rest of us when they get too big. Google/Alphabet is not exempt. I remember when their motto was "Don't be evil." Now they want to control what I can install on the personal devices I bought...
When a company changes their motto away from "don't be evil" you know damn well they are evil.
They still have that motto:
Don't be evil ^to the shareholders^
Do they have any evidence that F-droid serves more malware than Play Store?
I was curious of the same a few days back, and my research couldn't find a single instance of malware being distributed by the F-Droid store.
But even if it does, what's it to them if something they have no say over affects people not using their stuff?
Oh yeah, it's bullshit that reduces user agency and choice either way, I just don't believe for one second that it will improve security as Google is claiming. Its just about control and google consolidating power.
Like Bluetooth requiring location permissions?
That's actually good since bluetooth alone can be used to estimate your location. If the app can see all other bluetooth names, thet can be correlated to other user's data where the oosition is known.
And if you hit "pair new device", you phone will likely blast it's name out to all other bluetooth devices, givingyup it's position to any other nosy device/app.
Same goes for wifi.
Ad blockmalware being distributed by the F-Droid storeSince they force everything to be open source and i think has strict rules, no
I mean, there are many excellent open source malware.
The ??? Is mostly phishing campaigns, I think.
That's the thing though if it's open source and 99.9% don't check that 0.1% checking it will be enough.
The trouble with smaller open source software is that there's no 0.1% checking it. And from time to time a small projects becomes widely used and everyone assumes someone already checked it; it's a widely used open source software, after all.
I have the same skeptical mindset as you here, but like Wikipedia still seems fine.
I think most early users do check further than open source licenses. It's possible they'll add things later, but if they add after it has enough users we have significant number of users to have some people check. And if the user base is small then they're probably more involved, or are reading/modifying code for their use cases.
Of course it's not foolproof, but it has worked for a long time because of things like that
Thank God for Tylenol.
By definition in order to have . 1% then the sample size must be greater than 1,000. The vast majority of open source projects will not get to this level.
I think for a open source projects with such a low number of users, the first few users will definitely look further than "it's open source".
According to them, when they added a similar registration process and requirements for the playstore they saw a SIGNIFICANT drop on malware.
I don't find that shocking, and to be honest, I don't really see too much of a problem with forcing people to give that information to be on the play store. But to let people make programs that run on the hardware at all is crazy. Forbidding third party app stores is the most anti competitive bullshit ever.
That's because the playstore caters to everyone, including the children and the dumbest people on the planet.
When they say security, they mean their own financial security.
I'm almost certain that rooting is going to come back with a vengeance and we'll be doing ever so slightly more complicated workarounds. Fuck Google. I refuse to watch a YouTube ad or sponsor unless I directly consent to supporting that individual creator.
I'll take that bet.
I am going to bet they come for Rooting next. Unlockable Bootloaders.
In fact they already have started
https://github.com/zenfyrdev/bootloader-unlock-wall-of-shame
What am I looking at
Essentially saying we'll just 'install' piracy, as FitGirl is a major player in the piracy scene (as far as games go, no clue if they do other things).
Unless I'm wrong and Fitgirl now has repacks for major android/iOS apps that can be utilized through an existing app interface.
And also it's very probably a malicious app that does in fact not give you any pirated games.
Probably adware at best. Wouldn't doubt it also just sends you to non-play apk downloads of malware
The thumbnail says "unofficial" and malicious apps tend to try and trick you into thinking it's official. So I'm not sure it's malicious.
So them saying it's unofficial makes you think it is more safe, since surely if it said official it'd be malicious?
Sounds like putting unofficial there might just make even more people trust it then, good for a malicious app.
We're on like, what, three levels of reverse psychology now?
Not knowing that I assumed that Fitgirl was just some crappy gooner app that Google automatically promotes.
Yeah fitgirl would never release official android app or any platform for that matter.
Fitgirl is a release group for warez.
This is hilarious. Did not know fit girl was on the play store.
What is it and does it have anything to do with Audrey Tautou?
It's the symbol of that release group. The reason for that is unknown to me.
she's fit? (UK slang for attractive)
But my gosh doesn’t she know it.
Maybe she isn't and it's malware.
Did not know they were considered insecure either.
I trust apps from f-droid more than any app on Play Storw
you get 6 play points for it even
Looks fit though
amélie poulain aimes creme brulee
that's why duckduck gang 4 life