Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on feddit.de

17 replies

lemmy.cloudaf.site

"Let's charge full on handheld console money for a device that can't function away from a PS5!"

This should be doa but it's a PlayStation, it'll probably sell 30 million.

22
MentalEdgereply
sopuli.xyz

I suspect they may have chosen just the right price. People have paid more than this for controllers that don't come with a screen attached.

10
lemmy.dbzer0.com

That's more for enthusiast hardware. People pay $1000 for keyboards, but that doesn't mean they'll drop $200 for a remote streaming device.

1
MentalEdgereply
sopuli.xyz

It's literally the same price as the dualsense edge. You overestimating the capacity for reason among "console enthusiasts".

3
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Like I said, I'd consider that enthusiast level hardware. People who game "professionally" or love real flashy things. You can also spend $1000s to make coffee, or get a $10 French press.

0
MentalEdgereply
sopuli.xyz

So what's your point? That people who will pay this price do exist, or that they don't?

Because now I feel like you're trying to claim the former, to argue the latter.

0

Again, I'm confused, are you saying there are people who will buy this, or not?

And that's a subjective and arbitrary claim. It has no logical merit in arguing for or against whether people will consider this thing worth the price.

0

I am absolutely gonna spend $200 and countless hours of frustration to get this thing to run Yoshi’s Island at ~20 fps

5

It feels very overpriced considering it's just a streaming device and doesn't have OLED.

A hacked Switch with PS Remote Play makes more sense. Heck even a PS Vita has OLED and already supports Remote Play from a PS5.

2

You reached the end

PlayStation’s first Remote Play dedicated device, PlayStation Portal remote player, to launch later this year at $199.99 | Spyke