Epstein Birthday Letter With Trump’s Signature Revealed | Lawyers for Epstein’s estate have given Congress a copy of the 2003 birthday book
This post uses a gift link with a view count limit. When it runs out, there is an archived copy of the article
19 replies
What. the. fuck.
Edit: Also, who are the other names?
That is weird shit. I would be interested in hearing from the woman whose name is redacted about what exactly went on between her and these men.
Yep, being "sold" to trump as being "depreciated. Plus, is she a woman now but a girl then?
For anybody who doesn't know, "fully depreciated" is an accounting term for an asset that is all used up and worth only its salvage value. So, what Trump is basically saying here is "Jeffrey is showing a talent with money and women because he sold Trump a woman who was all used up for $22,500"
Obvious questions are:
Good but this isn't even close to enough. We need everything. Unredacted.
The entire executive branch belongs in prison. Along with anyone else involved.
Somehow that’s worse than I imagined. Yikes
Tough day for the 'cheering for gross predators' crowd.
Wow
Okay well this just confirms that Trumpstein lies. But Murca already knows this. Release his files! The Trumpstein files!
Is it just me, or does this look like a teen's body? It's not just that the "boobs" are small, it's where they're situated on the body.
It could be that Trump is just a bad artist. But, he definitely seems to have made an artistic choice when it comes to the size and placement of the boobs on that body.
Anyone else annoyed these stories don't link to the book?
I wonder about the redactions: seems mostly women's names & faces yet not men's. Ghislaine Maxwell shows women are capable of the wrongdoing in question.
The girls involved are victims, so I'm not surprised to see this decision about what to redact.
That's an assumption: how do you determine that? Wasn't Ghislaine Maxwell a victim?
I expect that the people doing the redacting have a very good idea of who was a perpetrator and who was a victim
Another word for assume. Aren't they disclosing these files, because they don't know & the public demands scrutiny? Unless they disclose their methods, skepticism is warranted.
Yikes!
Amputated arms? Cool, cool....
Tied behind her back, maybe.
Site doesn't load.