Harvard Startup Says Its Smart Glasses Will Do "Vibe Thinking" for You
https://futurism.com/smart-glasses-vibe-thinkingOpen linkView original on pawb.social115
Comments18https://futurism.com/smart-glasses-vibe-thinkingOpen linkView original on pawb.social
This is NOT a Harvard startup. This is a Harvard dropout creating a buzzword startup.
It's quite amazing the number of Harvard dropouts who become terrible persons. If I was a Harvard dropout, I sure wouldn't boast about it.
Zuckerberg made it fashionable. Now "Harvard drop out" is code for "I was too smart for Harvard so I bailed"
I have more respect for people who finish their studies. It takes more effort, dedication and talent than striking it rich on the latest fad du jour - which is what Gates, Fuckerberg and this cretinous AI-loving kid did.
Me: puts on glasses
Glasses: drain your savings account and put it into ours
Me: okay boss transferring now
Glasses: thanks fam self destructs
Me: oh no
dropout needs to become a slur
Wisdom is not data, and being "smart" is not about instant recall of trivia.
I already do vibe thinking:
Don''t forget testing in production!
When smart pants with vibe shitting ?
I just use my trusty Cinco D-Pants.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEwjogp4wIo
Unfortunately I need something for solid load.
If the name of the kid who founded this hateful startup rings a bell, it's because he's not new at this dystopian shit:
https://harvardtechnologyreview.com/2024/11/01/ai-glasses-unveil-privacy-risks-an-interview-with-the-creators-of-i-xray/
Meh. For the "vibe" lifestyle, those things needed a small display or teleprompter to tell me what to say, think and do all day. Without that it's just a self inflicted privacy nightmare and not even as much as the "glassholes" could do in 2013.
Could someone please define "vibe thinking" for me? I am afraid the article will give me literal cancer.
Advertisers have discovered that critical thinking slows or even dissuades consumerism, so they're keen to find ways to just insert themselves right into the thinking process by having an AI suggest answers to all life's queries.
These people saw the future depicted in Wall-E where the earth is a polluted mountain of trash and people have forgotten how to think and actually do anything, and were like "it's beautiful".
These might be illegal in two-party consent (to being recorded) states, namely California.
Why would I want to subordinate my independent rational thought to a corporate algorithm that views me as a product?