Spyke

It was not immediately obvious from the image (though you might see the starfish for scale), but these things are huge!

2
lemmy.world

did you add 'coal ash' in ms paint because you couldn't get gepetto to label it

31
xiareply
lemmy.sdf.org

Are you suggesting I should have asked it to reprocess the image, or ask it to try again?

-14
lemmy.zip

clearly everyone in the comments immediately pegged this as ai. i did too, but i am not sure what it is specifically that makes this feel so obviously ai. anyone got any ideas what it is that we're all picking up on here?

15
SSUPIIreply
sopuli.xyz

This is the art style that OpenAI forced its model to generate. Nobody else draws this way.

14
xiareply
lemmy.sdf.org

It makes you wonder if they have a whole bunch of training data in this style, or if it is the mathematical average of all cartoon styles mashed together.

5

If it was a simple average it would have been mangled. This is a deliberate fine-tune of the model to the particular style. For fine-tuning you need some type of input, if generated or human made doesn't matter.

The reason why they fine-tuned to this particular style is unknown, but they might be:

  • To quickly and not as expensively produce and release a usable model in the then more heated, now slowing down competition for better and better models
  • To reduce the model size as there is no need for lots of data on multiple styles.
  • To give a distinct comics style to their model, so to make people associate the image to their model instead of OP

There is nothing wrong with fine-tuning, and it is very often necessary to have the output not be gibberish.

6

You reached the end

Environmental Damage | Spyke