Spyke

Says a wealth-hoarding, mass carbon-polluting asshole. His ethics and those of everyday people are vastly vastly different due to his inability to pay taxes.

*You best start believing in Technofeudalist societies, you're in one. *

96
deegeesereply
sopuli.xyz

Inability?

Larry Ellison pays less taxes than you because he is a parasite on society and we let him steal from us.

48

You know what? Seeing as how we're getting it anyway whether we like it or not, I think I'd voluntarily take the surveillance state and censorship if it comes with rich people getting absolutely stomped by the government when they get out of line.

Maybe we can adopt the Vietnamese model where that billionaire either pays back $9 billion of embezzled funds or gets executed.

If we can't have a real democracy with real freedom I at least want blood of vengeance to bathe in from time to time.

18
lemmy.world

This is a reminder post. Remember when tech billionaire Larry Ellison said this?

38

He says that the police will be under constant surveillance. They already are and they still get away with crimes. Unless being a criminal is a cops best behaviour.

29

LOL! So republicans will stop committing crimes? Can't wait to see your son destroy CBS/Paramount.

27

while billionaires keep raping kids? yea no, go fuck yourself. this sounds like ravings of a person afraid of losing his possessions and life.

20
lemmy.world

What a coinkidink!

I just predicted this morning that the way things are going his and his billionaire friend’s heads will be on pikes before the end of the decade

It will be declared an international monument that will be visited by schools for decades to come to learn about the importance of regular class wars to keep the parasites in check in a society.

19

No spoilers, but I was expecting a bit more from the movie. I wasn't disappointed, but I was expecting more. Although apparently it's the first part of a trilogy so I'll wait and see.

2

Sci-Fi Author George Orwell: In my book I invented the Torment Nexus telescreen as a cautionary tale

Tech Company: At long last, we have created the Torment Nexus telescreen from classic sci-fi dystopian novel Don't Create The Torment Nexus Nineteen Eighty-Four.

19
lemmy.zip

Can we have a crowd-sourced bounty system for billionaires? The more billions they have the higher the bounty. I think it would be a good investment of public funds and benefit mankind greatly.

15
lemmy.ca

Must be nice to say from your private Hawaiian island

13
lemmy.world

Does he count as a citizen? Will he be surveilled also to keep him in line? Will it force them to be kind to their employees and not cheat them?

12

Truly nothing like Big Brother telling you he's gonna big brother you. And of course don't forget that those in power will never be subjected to this, it's only for the little peasants in case they may decide to not fully conform to their ideal society (wageslaving to make the rich richer until you drop dead)

12

The 0.1% are like turbo hedonists. If they beat the population into being severe ascetics then the ones who stick out will be: elites, politicians, authorities, politicians, suck-ups, spoiled heirs, politicians, etc.

I think all the little things people "get to do" help contribute to the "temporarily embarrassed millionaire" mentality. Take that away and there's going to be significantly less tolerance for corruption.

And the elites will create a system where the only way to vote is to spill blood.

10
lemmy.ml

lol is this guy seriously discounting that people, fully non-anonymous and out in the public view, can be assholes?

8
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

How was the Victorian era a surveillance state? Getting away with murder was basically a sure thing unless you were literally caught while sticking a knife into someone in broad daylight.

Idk what you're smoking but can I have some as well

3
melsaskcareply
lemmy.ca

I was relating "best behaviour" to the strict moral standards of the Victorian era. Is the surveillance related to breaking the law or catching you in an embarrassing situation? If it's the second case then we'll all surely be vexed.

2
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

I think you're probably imagining life in high society after watching everything Julian Fellowes has written.

Victorian prudishness is somewhat a myth. Not like completely, ofc, but way overblown.

If you'd make your argument just for Victorian high society, I might be inclined to agree. If you make it also for the middle classes, I'll be skeptical. And if you argue that the working classes would've all shared in those strict morals, then I'll disagree.

Although I'd like to point out that those Victorian high society or upper-middle class people, especially women, would've been de facto under surveillance most of the time, constantly having other people or at least servants around watching them.

But like we know from Downton Abbbey and the Gilded Age etc, they found ways around it as well. To answer your question about breaking the law or being embarrassed, being embarrassed would be why getting in trouble with the law would be troublesome and being embarrassed might mean being thrown out of society, which would be way worse than having to pay some fines.

Ooh I think there's a new gilded age episode today btw

2
melsaskcareply
lemmy.ca

Lots of words based on current tv culture. I don't watch the shows you are getting your information from. You may be right though. Human nature has been the same forever but there are pockets of collected, contrived, and derived behaviour, hither and yon, throughout history. Look at the USA today as a recent example that takes place in the television age (so you should be aware of that at least). I hope you enjoy your television episode you are excited about. Don't make assumptions about me and what I watch. It makes you seem stupider than your fancy words imply. You seem like you are talking down to me in your answer so in the best historical context I can muster I would say...fuck off you arrogant piece of smugness. That took a turn, didn't it?

-1
Dasusreply
lemmy.world

Yeah I don't get my information from TV-shows, you shouldn't do that kid. I get my information from actual sources so I can spot anachronisms in tv-shows. Now that you'd understand since half the vocabulary went over your head by your own admission despite "the Gilded Age" being a literal and actual period of history.

I don't have a TV and I would never put some reality TV garbage in it, which you're clearly addicted to.

in the best historical context I can muster I would say...fuck off you arrogant piece of smugness.

Ooh, babby a lil' mad that I pointed out how little they know? :(

0
melsaskcareply
lemmy.ca

You guys who deny you watch television but constantly reference it are a dime a dozen. I think I heard that screed you wrote on an old "Fridays" skit. Try an original thought once in a while and show some authenticity. Ooohhh....I'm so mad and toddlerish right now! My "fuck off" still stands though. Bye sweetie.

0

I reference shows which I watch.

I haven't had a broadcast TV in my apartment for like 15-20 years, got tired of the ads and never went back.

I download shows I choose to watch, to watch when I so choose.

You really thought you had a gotcha there, didn't'ya?

I think I heard that screed you wrote on an old "Fridays" skit.

I've no idea what this means. Are you having a stroke? Should I alert the authorities?

2