Spyke
pawb.social

Yeah, I don't know why we glorify military service. It's just exploiting people to enforce exploitation overseas at this point

But even aside from that, I feel like this is in bad taste... They just finished fucking over all the trans people in the military. The tone is like telling someone "you're welcome here" as they're lying there after being thrown out

It's like saying "well, I believe you're an American" as they're put on the plane. Just doesn't seem like the right thing to say in that moment

42
lemmy.world

I don't know why we glorify military service

Because we should glorify service to the people, and service to the state can be and sometimes is an abstract a form of that. Same reason we pay teachers in pats on the back instead of money.

4
lemmy.blahaj.zone

Because we should glorify service to the people

Is it, though? Or is it just servicing particular monetary interests?

4

Previously yes. They used to get deployed around here to help in natural emergencies. Fires, floods, landslides, stuff like that. Currently, cannot speak to whether they do.

2
pawb.social

We don't glorify service to the state in any other way though. We look down on public servants.

And military service is the biggest gulf between service to the people and service to the state... It doesn't help the people at all, it only serves the state

1
lemmy.world

... It doesn't help the people at all, it only serves the state

Depends on your state's situation. USA, yes. Somewhere like south korea, no

1

It's also definitely true for South Korea, or Ukraine

Just... In these cases, the state is much more aligned with the people. Service to the state means protecting the people

This is just not common. This is an exception

1
Sergioreply
lemmy.world

yes, as evidenced by the dent in the seated guy's cane.

24
cm0002reply
lemmy.world

While its true in an ideal world there would be no militaries and no war

Unfortunately, we do not live in that world, any country that doesn't have a, or is under the protection of another's, military will be taken advantage of sooner or later.

There are many hostile countries in this world

7
qazreply
lemmy.world

True, but the USA has been the instigator in many cases. Was invading Iraq really necessary?

7

No, but that's just criticism or condemnation of specific actions taken by a certain military, which should always be done.

But condemning a country just for having a military is what's silly

5
sh.itjust.works

Was/were are verbs, not pronouns (yes I am fun at parties thanks)

39

having pronouns for dead/no longer existent things in English would be kinda interesting though

Is there a language that does this actually

6
arrow74reply
lemmy.zip

Children Combatants in Iraq

There now it's legal

7

You reached the end