How do you decide what to make? Functional vs art objects etc.?
I have an extremely privileged set up. I have access to a wheel and soon will have access to a kiln with very little restrictions. I have no issue with recycling clay so I'm not worried about having to like what I throw or hand build and can very easily scrap something up until bisque fire without "losing" anything other than my own time.
I've been focusing on practicing the technical aspects, so throwing cylinders and other objects with no intention to keep them. Some I recycle immediately (cutting them so I can see the cross section and what I need to pay more attention to) and some I keep to practice trimming. I still throw too thick, so I have a lot to trim off. I've taken to carving (like this object) to cut out a lot of weight fast and also to play with carving as a technique.
When carving, I find myself thinking, "How to I make this the most uncomfortable/unnerving/evil but still useful object possible?". Not like poorly constructed object but an object that makes the user feel uneasy while using it. While they are still technically functional, I think of it as more an art object because it's meant to be experienced by people in a specific context not just something you have in your house or give as a gift. It feels expressive which could be nice.
I have a laundry list of objects I want to make for myself, basically custom dishware. There is some creativity in that for sure, but the intent is practical use.
My partner gets inspired when thinking about gifts to make specific people. He's got two people in mind right now and describes it as just knowing what he wants to make them. I think that's super cool.
Anyways, if you had no time pressures, equipment access pressures or need to create objects that sell, what would you make? How do you balance creative work with functional or did you find a sweet spot where you get both? I'd love to hear your process!
I'm sorry no-one else has pitched-in, on this one: it's an interesting question!
I'm wired fundamentally-differently than you are: for me the fundamental motivation is functional ( I've no means of doing pottery presently, but there was some wonderful, simple, Japanese stoneware I'd love to replicate, & .. OMG, Japanese porcelain can be gorgeous .. )
& the artistic is the inspiration/magic which the finished-work is embodying..
I can kinda understand your partner's "for that someone, that is needed" thing..
but making something for someone else means that one is answering a need in them, so it's .. kinda functional .. emotionally-functional, or something?
It's still got to be "functional", for me to have any motivation to make it, though..
even commenting on stuff: what's worth more than keen insights?
They weigh nothing, you can have scads of the things, & the more people who have good ones, the richer EVERYBODY is, together..
Functional, see?
Making the world happier is functional.
Making the world healthier is functional.
& other people find that making the world more hopeless is what they mean, or more suffering ( actual-sadism is a real force, as this world demonstrates )..
The nature of the motivation and the domain in which the motivation works & the frame-of-reference-of-the-motivation seem to decide it all..
You want a particular distortion-of-sentience, I want a particular distinctly-different distortion-of-sentience, in the ones among the resultant-world..
but it's still an expression of one's meaning, right?
( also, we have to keep in mind that people change: someone can suddenly have had enough of a particular motivation, dropping it & moving-on.. that too is natural )
_ /\ _