Spyke
lemmings.world

The word "blame" normally implies that something bad has happened.

207
lemmy.world

Exactly!

"So, sorry we'd love to help you astroturf the EU elections, but those pesky laws are stopping us."

33

Exactly this. This messaging is for their customers, e.g. those that buy political ads, and their investors, those that want line go up regardless of how. They aren't speaking to their users. Their users are part of the product they sell.

16

Bots and troll farms are not impacted, though. I don't expect this will lead to better politics.

7

meta: we're stopping political ads because of the evil eu pls write them and complain

literally everyone: another benefit to being in the eu <3

57
Babalugatsreply
feddit.uk

The government parties do. That's who they're targeting with this 'news'.

Any government party seen bending to the metatwats can fuck off too. But unfortunately they really want the exposure to show the kids how hip they are.

11
leftzeroreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

The government parties do.

The government parties who approved these regulations..?

1

Not all of them, but that's what meta is trying to get at. "Your laws stop us from marketing you u to the masses"

Fuck 'em. I hope I live to watch meta crumble to shit and everything like it.

3

"No one"

They don't give a shit what their users want. Their users are part of the product they sell. Their customers are their advertisers. This is bad news for political advertisers and their investors, both of whom absolutely want political advertising on the platform. This is a good thing. It would be a much better thing if people would just stop using Meta products altogether

2

We're sad to announce that, from that day forward, you will no longer be able to see political ads on Meta services like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.

(Idk how to blame the EU while trying to sound like a sane, professional corporation not throwing a hissy fit)

19

A fantastic example of why regulation can be good and is often necessary. You can‘t leave tech corporations or even most corporations on their own accord. They need a short leash or they‘re going to tear humanity apart.

17

Under the regulations, which are set to take effect on Oct. 10, platforms will have to label political ads, disclosing who paid for them, and what campaign, referendum or legislative process they’re connected to

Oh yeah they sound really unworkable, who could possibly expect meta to take this very basic information from their advertisers and then display it in a small text box.

Of course not seeing the ads is even better so I don't think anyone will complain.

16
lemmy.today

nothing is stopping them to push propaganda(russian backed) into peoples feeds that arnt ads.

15
Miareply
feddit.org

Aren't these ads too? Someone as paid for this propaganda so it is technically ads right?

1

Like reedit they look the other way because fake accounts generate lots of engagement. They could easily shut down such accounts and they choose not to.

2

"I'm sorry to say I cannot accept any more money from disinformation groups political parties, particularly from certain regions* because another region won't let me put your ads out there for the plebs users to be manipulated informed."

^*^ ^-^ ^Russia,^ ^China,^ ^North^ ^Korea,^ ^Iran,^ ^and^ ^other^ ^associated^ ^places.^

9

They probably think this will persuade the politicians to review these rules, as they can't reach their target audiences anymore. I hope they see the overwhelming support for this decision, but I'm not sure if I'm in a bubble. I only see positive reactions so far. There was 1 critical article in the news, but just stating facts, no opinions. I think it's great. Less brainwashing going on during the election cycles from now on since Facebook in particular allowed for some really specific demographic targeting.

9
feddit.org

Let's be honest: We are talking about several billions of dollars of ad revenue over the years. Meta has the resources to work within those rules and earn billions. If they do not want to do that, there is something really shady going on.

8

Or maybe long term plan: let the political parties know if they want back in, to revise their policies in a more pro-meta stance?

2

Good, now Hungary can put that 2M EUR per month from propaganda into research, education and healthcare.

7
Hubireply
feddit.org

Nah it has already been allocated to Orban's private residence.

12
100reply

10m to build another stadium in his hometown

7

The regulations impose additional requirements for a reason - because political advertising can be extremely dangerous. If it's a question of no political advertising or opaque, microtargeted political advertising that can't be investigated later, then it's an easy choice.

6

Oh shit, really?

That's really a pity that luckily for me I'm no longer giving an absolute metric fuck about meta and any of its shit content or its servi..spywares since 10 years at least already, and also I haven't the slightest idea of changing my plans in that regard.

4

There is nothing to blame about except this should have come earlier and everywhere.

2

You reached the end