I have no idea what that actually proves, as I could just as easily mess with the gimp screenshot in, say... gimp... (or I suppose ask GPT to make a gimp screenshot?) but here you go.
I just wanted to see if you'd actually go out of your way to fake a gimp screenshot. The guy has 17 fingers and 3 arms and the baby has 14 toes and one hand is meshing into the arm of the man. It's AI. The screenshot also doesn't have a layer for most things that would have layers like the text that says "Yoink" and for some reason the baby is half in one layer and half another. The checkered pattern in the layer view is messed up. Why would you go to such lengths to lie? Just say it's AI. It's obvious.
I don't know what you think I'm claiming. I just mashed some images together, I never said I took them with a camera. FYI: The screenshot is legit. Also, you might be interested to learn about "merge down", it really helps with layer management. https://docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/gimp-layer-merge-down.html
By using the software as intended. I guess I could file a bug report, but I think it's hilarious that you think I spent a bunch of time compositing a gimp screenshot to that level of detail, but refuse to believe I would spend even a few seconds compositing the original (with obvious 3rd arm and poorly colored zig-zag join points).
18 replies
Ai shit
Subject matter aside, AI memes are acceptable to use in this community.
The votes tell a different story.
I guess it is allowed in the sense that moderators won't remove it, without a guarantee against an angry mob razing it with down-votes. :)
You know you are missing the only fun part of having a baby ?
Anyway, fuck AI.
I wonder if people are mistaking my rough gimp composition for AI giving the guy a third arm...
Literally everything about this looks like AI because it is AI...
Yes, the base images are AI generated, but it will actually refuse to generate such an image (child endangerment or abduction).
Yeah I see people complaining about AI but this just looks like every shit post I made in 2015 paint.net
the problem isn't the third arm, or the multitude of fingers on the third picture for that matter, it's the very fact that this is AI
Post your gimp screenshot
I have no idea what that actually proves, as I could just as easily mess with the gimp screenshot in, say... gimp... (or I suppose ask GPT to make a gimp screenshot?) but here you go.
Edit: image removed for privacy reasons.
I just wanted to see if you'd actually go out of your way to fake a gimp screenshot. The guy has 17 fingers and 3 arms and the baby has 14 toes and one hand is meshing into the arm of the man. It's AI. The screenshot also doesn't have a layer for most things that would have layers like the text that says "Yoink" and for some reason the baby is half in one layer and half another. The checkered pattern in the layer view is messed up. Why would you go to such lengths to lie? Just say it's AI. It's obvious.
He did:
https://lemmy.sdf.org/comment/21271387
I don't know what you think I'm claiming. I just mashed some images together, I never said I took them with a camera. FYI: The screenshot is legit. Also, you might be interested to learn about "merge down", it really helps with layer management. https://docs.gimp.org/2.10/en/gimp-layer-merge-down.html
How'd you get it to do this?
By using the software as intended. I guess I could file a bug report, but I think it's hilarious that you think I spent a bunch of time compositing a gimp screenshot to that level of detail, but refuse to believe I would spend even a few seconds compositing the original (with obvious 3rd arm and poorly colored zig-zag join points).