Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on thelemmy.club

19 replies

piefed.jeena.net

I remember going voting with my parents in the 80's in communist Poland. Voting was mandatory, so you would get into trouble if you wouldn't go. It also wasn't private, so you basically had to show what you voted for before putting your ballot into the ballot box. On top of they there was only one party which you could vote for.

28
Mothrareply
mander.xyz

So practically a ritual. What's the point of voting if there is only one candidate? Rhetorical question

16

There are multiple candidates, but if elections are held in a one party state, they all belong to the same party or a party that is effectively under the dominating party's control.

4
lemmy.world

While I agree with your scepticism initially, I worry that this is something a right wing lunatic would posture about Democrats.

3

I think that nazi is an expression of trauma, given form by propaganda.

Take away the trauma and nazi disappears.

Take away the propaganda and you get, I dunno, less organized bad behavior.

1
lemmy.world

Sometimes it's a good sign, at least in politics. The 99-1 Senate vote to kill the anti-AI-law ban of the latest bill was telling. Same goes for unanimous SCOTUS decisions. If both liberals and conservatives overwhelmingly agree on a thing, it's almost certainly a good call.

1

You reached the end

When everybody agrees so perfectly. When conformity is so absolute. When dissent is so rare. It makes one suspicious. | Spyke