Spyke

Elon Musk says SpaceX will decommission Dragon spacecraft after Trump threat

KEY POINTS

  • Elon Musk said SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft “immediately” because of threats by Donald Trump to cancel government contracts with Musk’s businesses.
  • Musk’s announcement on his social media site X escalated a war of words with Trump that began after the Tesla CEO criticized the major tax bill being pushed by the Republican president.
  • A SpaceX Dragon capsule brought two NASA astronauts back to Earth in March after they were stranded for months at the International Space Station by a Boeing Starliner capsule.
Elon Musk says SpaceX will decommission Dragon spacecraft after Trump threathttps://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/05/musk-trump-spacex-dragon-nasa.htmlOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
lemmy.dbzer0.com

And this is why billionaires should not control vital resources

211
sh.itjust.works

I'm okay if billionaires exist, but their political and economic power should be somehow kept in check

-43
lemmy.ca

Nope. No one person ever needs anything near that amount of money.

58
Wilcoreply
lemm.ee

Agreed. No one should have that much wealth. Saying it is fine is like saying cancer is fine for a body.

16

I'm okay with billionaires if the government provides a UBI of ten million a year. A hundred years of UBI seems like a fair amount for someone to own if they worked really hard and inherited a nice house. Houses are one of the only things I think should be inherited.

3
fedia.io

I think I’d laugh myself unconscious if Trump nationalized Space X.

101
moonlightreply
fedia.io

I've been saying for years that it needs to be nationalized. And this is a really good time to do so; Elon is showing that him being in charge is a national security risk.

But Trump 100% doesn't have the guts to do it.

42
sp3ctr4lreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I have said before I will eat both of my socks if a SpaceX rocket and ship fly humans to the moon and safely return by 2030.

I will also eat both of my socks if a two bit mob boss turned fascist nationalizes any significant corporate or industrial anything.

Fascists don't outright nationalize shit, because if they did, the entire oligarch class that is a huge part of their support base would turn on them instantly.

Fascists make deals with, facilitate, get kick backs from corporate oligarchs.

They essentially never seize their assets outright, because that would undermine the entire capitalist system that the corpos rely on, and support fascists so that they will keep getting tax breaks and grants and other government subsidies.

3

You’re almost certainly right, but since the situation is already off the rails, I just figured I’d throw nationalization out there for laughs.

2

Find me a fascist movement/party/figure that's formally controlled a state for more than 20 years, that's outlasted its big special leader boy... you know, a 'competent' one.

Mussolini's lasted 21 years, and he was waaaay younger than Trump when he started.

... Are you going to call Mussolini 'competent'?

Fascists are definitionally incompetent and irrational, they are literally anti-Truth with a capital T, the philosophical, as close to objective and reasonable 'truth' we can get.

But, they are also very well definable by understanding that if they fuck with the money too hard, the money will fuck them back.

2
lemmy.today

It is the end of manned space flight for the USA. Thanks MAGAts.

69
lemmy.world

Blue Origin will have us doing it again. They truly are the tortoise of the race.

8
boaratioreply
lemmy.world

Yeah, let's get the other billionaire idiot on the payroll so he can get Katy Perry to the ISS.

58
lemmy.world

Blue Origin has used FAR less government money than SpaceX. That's one of the reason they sell those trips. You have to pay for things somehow.

3
Cocodapufreply
lemmy.world

I mean, SpaceX has a lot more government contacts, because you know, they have working orbital vehicles...

Edit: I deleted my other post because I was mostly wrong. I didn't realize New Glen has actually launched once. Good on them for achieving orbit.

14
lemmy.world

They had way more government funding to get to the point Blue Origin is at. I'm not just talking about right now. That would be silly.

5

Right. They built their rockets on Amazon wage theft and stock profits. Totally different than stealing directly from tax payers.

EDIT: Wage theft.

6

Now, now, those were the ways of Reddit. I'd like to think we conduct ourselves better than that on Lemmy.

4
lemmy.world

WE'RE NOT GOING TO MARS, YOU FUCKING NAZI ASSCLOWN. IT'S A TERRIBLE IDEA.

NASA HAS LAUNCHED MANY ROCKETS FOR MANY DECADES. YOU BLOW SHIT UP BECAUSE YOU THINK THE RULES OF PHYSICS AND MECHANICS DONT APPLY TO YOU.

EVERYTHING WOULD BE BETTER IF YOU WERE DEPORTED TO A BLACK SITE.

FUCK YOU, ELMO

29

Deliberately burning up a viable planet and blowing all your resources to go to a dead planet is fucking stupid on every level and every metric. Absolutely indefensible.

7
Womblereply
lemmy.world

Falcon9 bring the cost of launching something to LEO down by an order of magnitude?

12
0x0reply
lemmy.zip

Ariane would like a word.

1

I'm not aware of any human rated spacecraft being launched with Ariane. I know there were some concepts for at least Ariane 5, and it would be cool for Europe to be independent on this.

3

Ariane has an astronaut ferry and reentry vehicle? That's news to me. Also: they're more than 2x as expensive per kg to orbit.

2
WalnutLumreply
lemmy.ml

Soooooo... Kind of...

I didn't check the cargo numbers but for Crewed missions we have some nice estimates from the OIG in 2024 based on the crew program development costs and the built-in 6 flight missions we got for the contracts:

-SpaceX Dragon ~ 55 million/seat

-Boeing Starliner ~ 90 million/seat

-Russia Soyuz ~ 86 million/seat

-Space Shuttle ~ 87 million/seat (adjusted for inflation)

Soyuz was ~ 20 million a seat in 2007, 2013 it was ~ 55 million a seat, and 2014-2018 it was 62 million a seat, now it's that 86 number.

Funny thing is happening at SpaceX recently, namely NASA used up all 6 flights that were 55 million a seat, so they needed to extend for flights 7-9 and 10-14

In February 2022 NASA Extended their contract with SpaceX for flights 7-9 at around 258 million per flight (so ~64.5 million per seat) and again in June 2022 for flights 10-14 at 288 million per flight (so ~72 million per seat)

So SpaceX came out of the gate with their handfuls of investor cash and subsidized the original contracts, but they're likely rapidly increasing prices now that they've burned through most of that runway.

2

Eh, depending how old you are. I can believe somebody is going to Mars in ~50 years.

1
lemmy.world

Why do I feel like the entire government is based off a 2yo building a house of cards with his bully from school.

26

Dominance of this country is being fought over by a couple of petty 12 year old tyrants. It’s like a version of that Twilight Zone where the powerful kid is surrounded by people trying not to upset him, except the kids are drug-addled and senile.

20

The SpaceX that got 3 billion dollars to get us to Mars and didn't get beyond blowing up a banana over the Indian ocean, that one yes

12

What’s the threat here? If you don’t give me money then I won’t spend it?

10