The worst ones off the top of my head were Spears and Emma Watson. Holy crap the sleazy press crowed when they turned “legal”. It was pretty gross. No shortage of sketchy leering photographs when they were under age, too.
Wasn't there a countdown until they were legal? I mean, it's probably not unique but I do think there was a rather public countdown for them specifically.
Probably; I remember there definitely was for Emma Watson.
There's a bit during the credits of the movie The Master of Disguise where someone, while asking if the main character can turn into absolutely anyone, floats the idea of the Olsen Twins; they were 16 when that movie was released (which probably means they were 15 when the scene was filmed).
Ah, yep. Forgot about them. Cyrus, Lohan…a ton of the popular girl stars from Disney and other entertainment types all suffered. I thing the singers suffered worse, and those backed by Disney’s publicity machine that put them in the public eye more often.
I dont want to pick a fight but i hope people who upvote this while believing everything ai is bad reflect on the fact that this meme was made using ai.
My point is ai is often used in bad ways but not automatically and pointing out proper use exists gets people angry.
It's a tool, it can have good and bad uses. But what's interesting is the "dreams" of those who invested in the first place, their objectives: cheap labor, capitalist expansion. And the means to achieve it: ignore copyright like hypocrites.
Sure, the tool is here. "Confetti left the cannon". Now, what is everyone doing with it? Good and bad uses, of course. But that's beyond the point of the critique.
This falacy is quite common, "science is like a hammer". Only those who never studied the least of social sciences or human history believe such thing (including most exact and natural scientists.. •sigh•)
We can use AI to make Star Wars better
By fixing the dialogue?
....
By fixing the dialogue, right?
WE WANT DARTH JAR JAR!
With big boomers!
Meesa stacked
'Squeeze me.
The fuck we do. Fuck darth jar jar, stupidest shit I’ve ever heard of.
Ok, second stupidest shit behind the sequels, especially TLJ. But a strong second.
They should have stopped at the OT instead of making only garbage afterwards.
I hate this image so much.
Someone needs to tweet this to Kevin James
While the punchline is funny, it's probably worth at least likewise considering that Natalie Portman's experience with her first film resulted in – at 13 years old – being sexualized pretty much instantaneously, an experience which may've (I can't find any quotes confirming or denying) impacted how she negotiates with nudity in roles she takes throughout her career.
The worst ones off the top of my head were Spears and Emma Watson. Holy crap the sleazy press crowed when they turned “legal”. It was pretty gross. No shortage of sketchy leering photographs when they were under age, too.
The olsen twins were also caught in the same nonsense.
That was extra fucked up, as they had been public figures since they were toddlers.
Wasn't there a countdown until they were legal? I mean, it's probably not unique but I do think there was a rather public countdown for them specifically.
Probably; I remember there definitely was for Emma Watson.
There's a bit during the credits of the movie The Master of Disguise where someone, while asking if the main character can turn into absolutely anyone, floats the idea of the Olsen Twins; they were 16 when that movie was released (which probably means they were 15 when the scene was filmed).
Found a good article that goes into it, and yeah it basically what you'd expect.
https://www.seattlepi.com/lifestyle/article/celebrity-18th-birthday-countdowns-have-long-been-1148050.php
Ah, yep. Forgot about them. Cyrus, Lohan…a ton of the popular girl stars from Disney and other entertainment types all suffered. I thing the singers suffered worse, and those backed by Disney’s publicity machine that put them in the public eye more often.
I have considered it. Thanks.
Genuine support for increasing breast size of everything. My fridge could use some improvements.
Nice extra compartments for storing the milk.
Organic milk, even.
Right, Ani?? Ani you've hardly touched your picnic food items ANIIIIiieeuyyhh🤖
Ani, are you okay? So, Ani, are you okay? Are you okay, Ani? Ani, are you okay? Will you tell us that you′re okay?
does a jedi flip
You've been hit by
You've been hit by
A smooth jedi council!
AUH!!
Comments you can hear 🎶
prompt: make her more like a queen aerola of the nip'oo system
Her poor back
Hentai logic now applies, she'll be fine
It definitely makes this meme better.
the book of booba
I assume this must be what Jolene looked like too
Im begging you please don’t take my man
zoom
Zoom out
Enhance
The machine spirits do not flow through any machine used for generative AI. They displease the Omnissiah and should be eradicated
......and saved.
Far too big.
Edit: The split is roughly 5:4 too big vs. not, yet 90% of hentai has such udders.
One has to wonder if that's Ai,... and those boobs are based on someone, who is it?
Send this over to Reddit; they'll have it figured out within an hour.
Kinda looks like Angie Faith
I dont want to pick a fight but i hope people who upvote this while believing everything ai is bad reflect on the fact that this meme was made using ai.
My point is ai is often used in bad ways but not automatically and pointing out proper use exists gets people angry.
"I don't want to pick a fight"
To be fair, just because you don't want to do something doesn't mean you won't do it
Yeah, they're clearly picking a fight, aren't they? *cracks knuckles*
It's a tool, it can have good and bad uses. But what's interesting is the "dreams" of those who invested in the first place, their objectives: cheap labor, capitalist expansion. And the means to achieve it: ignore copyright like hypocrites.
Sure, the tool is here. "Confetti left the cannon". Now, what is everyone doing with it? Good and bad uses, of course. But that's beyond the point of the critique.
This falacy is quite common, "science is like a hammer". Only those who never studied the least of social sciences or human history believe such thing (including most exact and natural scientists.. •sigh•)
See also: Do artifacts have politics?
And exactly those often times it's bad. Generative AI is bullshit pushed by ai bros to replace good work and the Human touch.
ML on the other hand isn't even called AI and I used most of the times in good and relevant scientific ways.