Spyke
feddit.org

Mate, I'm saying this in the nicest way I can: You need to rephrase this because no pun did what?

6
sopuli.xyz

No pun in ten did.

Not one pun, of those ten puns did win

“No pun intended”

5

If we want to be pedantic, the setup would have ended with "... hoping to win"

Then we have "no pun in ten did [win]".

But really, it's fine. Bravo.

4
Lumidaubreply
feddit.org

I got the joke, in fact I knew the joke. The problem here is that nowhere does it set up the "no pun did WIN".

3
sopuli.xyz

Are you an english speaker at home?

This grammar is very readable to me.

In the first sentence (title) they said they send poems for the goal of having a winner. The second sentence builds upon that.

I dont think this format is very unusual.

3
Lumidaubreply
feddit.org

"I sent in 10 jokes in hopes of having a winner. No pun in ten did (have a winner(??))."

"I sent in 10 jokes in hopes of one winning. No pun in ten did (win)."

9
sopuli.xyz

Having looked it up, you are technicly correct.

It does feel like a very minor imprecision though, especially in a pun community on the internet where half the people dont speak english as a first language.

3
Lumidaubreply
feddit.org

The entire point is the wordplay though.

"I want to be cremated as it is my last hope for a smoking hot body."

vs

"I want to be cremated as it is my last hope to be sexy."

6

Now i really owe you a apology

Because i only now realize the second layer that “no pun in ten did” was the winning pun. Right?

Its still somewhat funny without that dept and i got caught on that.

I dont think op knew this themselves but i very much understand your point now. I recall an experience myself where i knew a joke well and then heared half of that joke. Yeah i get it now.

Thanks for your pantience.

3

I get the joke, I knew the joke before. I am saying this is a bad telling of the joke.

2

You reached the end