Exactly. They don't think they'll work means they couldn't even be bothered to attempt it.
This is the problem with kids today, no gumption. Back in my day when I was told to push an onion up my rectum to fight against shingles then, gorramitt, that onion was up there without a moment's thought.
And let me tell you I've never had shingles. Plus, only a few hours later, we then had a tasty onion for our mud stew!!
Walmart asked the question "If we can't have replicators from star trek, what if we built a global supply chain fueled by human misery that spreads broken window syndrome like project Pluto spreads radiation instead."
That's company is not going to make human friendly decisions, they're going to make profit obsessed psychopath friendly decisions.
17 replies
Have you tried?
Exactly. They don't think they'll work means they couldn't even be bothered to attempt it.
This is the problem with kids today, no gumption. Back in my day when I was told to push an onion up my rectum to fight against shingles then, gorramitt, that onion was up there without a moment's thought.
And let me tell you I've never had shingles. Plus, only a few hours later, we then had a tasty onion for our mud stew!!
That seems expensive for regular mushrooms.
These are sanitary mushrooms.
Load bearing mushroom
Was their shopper Princess Peach?
Why hate on the natural options?
Maybe this is a software bug? The prices are the same, or it could just be a coincident.
I'm fairly convinced it's a shitty image similarity algorithm based off the color and whiteness of a typical tampon
I doubt you would use a image algorithm for this. There is so much better data to cross correlate, not to mention cheaper 😂.
Then again, it's not working so can't expect them to design it well.
Walmart asked the question "If we can't have replicators from star trek, what if we built a global supply chain fueled by human misery that spreads broken window syndrome like project Pluto spreads radiation instead."
That's company is not going to make human friendly decisions, they're going to make profit obsessed psychopath friendly decisions.
What else could it be? One person bought both once? That's also a shitty algorithm.
simplest answer is an database array misalignment, it matched items with the same price instead of another similar attribute.
ML for commonly bought stuff is way overkill for a single query and would eat up infra costs.
"you were already in for 4.67, so we're taking it"
Have you tried, or are you a coward?
I'm a guy, so I don't think I could try if I wanted to.
I guess you'd have to really want to.