Spyke
lemm.ee

I wonder who they will sell their data to

189
fedia.io

Their creditors are going to be looking for recompense. So I feel like this is one of those times when we use the answer of "yes".

106

one of the cofounders is trying to buyout the company but I have to imagine they'll get outbid in the bakruptcy process.

5
seeigelreply
feddit.org

The Saudi investment fond. It's a perfect complement for that Pokemon Go data.

55
oce 🐆reply
jlai.lu

Some future Musk backed AI eugenic human embryo generator.

34
Ledericasreply
lemm.ee

He's Looking for female incubators, of course they have to be white for him.

9
jaybonereply
lemmy.world

Hasn’t he already had like a dozen “female incubators”?

This guy can’t be bothered to wear a condom or pull out before he jizzes his vile seed into whatever human dna compatible life form chooses to allow his penis entry?

4
Asidonhoporeply
lemmy.world

I'm led to believe Musk is incapable of intercourse due to a botched penis enlargement procedure, and at least most of his offspring are through AI (artificial insemination)

6

musks penis got a botched enlargement procedure, by a questionable surgeon, it was permanently mangled. and its probably why he only does IVF, its probably why its projecting his insecurities.

1
lemmy.world

How on Earth did they manage to fuck this up?

They were the leading firm in a field where having the most data makes yours the most accurate tests. Their product sold for hundreds of dollars a pop, with practically zero marginal costs to run the tests. And they were really popular, selling like hotcakes.

It's insane just how astoundingly incompetent upper management can be sometimes.

141
slaacaareply
lemmy.world

Good article. It was fundamentally not a good business model. You have to acquire new customers constantly just to keep the lights on, it’s unsustainable. Adding on top of that the expectations from investors to grow every year, and the collapse we see now is guatanteed.

I see they tried to diversify, that could have helped, but without a recurring revenue stream at the core of your business, you cannot become the big company they wanted to be.

28

i was comparing it to THERANOS, more or less it was a scam from the start. Having someone like british pharm company glaxo-kline smith access to data without consent is just asking for trouble.

2

Yes, just terrible management. They could have just made good money, but no, there has to be more. So excessive greed at any price - now it's just bankruptcy. But I'm sure that won't bother the senior management: they've already put their millions in a safe place and will simply move on. The next company that needs their outstanding leadership is bound to come along...

16
meliantereply
lemm.ee

No returning customers, due to the nature of the business. It's dead from the start.

40

I'm not sure what would make you think the "customers" for an enormous DNA database were the people providing the DNA.

Those people were just paying to be the product.

35

A person is born every day.

You are not born every day.

Seems clear that you must not be a person.

12
[deleted]reply
lemmy.world

It happened to me yesterday and now I hear it only happens once?

Smh my head.

6
SippyCupreply
feddit.nl

Right, but the data you get from that test is pretty broad. One test will create a background for an entire family. You only need to do one for one child. Or if both parents have one, or a sibling of both parents have done one, the children of that pair also no longer needs a test to see their background.

3

It's not just about background though. Could also filter the results for genetic markers of medical conditions, something that may differ between individuals.

2

People that would presumably already know their lineage since their parents already took the test.

2

true but after the enormous initial boom they would have reached an equilibrium of a small trickle. the question is if that small trickle is enough to sustain a company on its own, so apparently not.

2
CitricBasereply
lemmy.world

It can't be just that, right? There are loads of successful products that any given person only ever buys once.

12
lemmy.world

That's easy! 1: Coffin 2: Headstone 3: septic tank 4: bad parachute 5: cemetery plot

There's, uh, a bit of a theme with these though.

32

everyone is guaranteed to buy death/funeral related stuff, not everyone wants a DNA test. Also all of that crap (headstone, funeral service, coffin etc) is bundeled together in a massive payday, not to mention funeral places tend to price gouge the bereaved. So a single death is a much bigger payday than a single DNA test.

As for the other products you mentioned, i doubt any of those companies literally only sell those individual products. They probably diversify to other products and services too.

1
asapreply
lemmy.world

Come on. Any "buy it for life" product will fall in that category. Safety razor for example.

14

Ah, you mean the original "razor and blades" business model that ensures repeat customers.

(Yes, I'm aware that many people who use safety razors these days are not necessarily buying from brands that make both the razor and the blades, I am such a person myself, I'm somewhat joking on that)

But even in the realm of "buy it for life" items, you can still end up with repeat customers. Maybe you want a second razor for your travel toiletry bag, or to keep in your second bathroom. Maybe you just see one that looks cooler, or the handle is more ergonomic, or the way you change the blade seems more convenient.

And BIFL items still do sometimes get lost, stolen, given away, thrown out, or sometimes even broken and need to be replaced.

And unless the world's population starts shrinking, there will always be new shavers hitting puberty who will eventually need their own razor.

With a DNA test, unless you're questioning paternity or testing for specific genetic traits like cancer risk and such, once your parents have taken a test, you and your siblings don't really need to, you know what your parents are so you know what you are.

2

Companies that sell safety razors (or whatever buy-once product) probably also do lots of other stuff to diversify.

2
Jerb322reply
lemmy.world

A headstone, grave, urn, wedding dress, and any outfit used in a religious ceremony.

7

I know several people that have bought more than one wedding dress.

5
lemmy.world

Reminder that you can download and save your data locally then revoke your consent agreements and delete your data. Who knows if it will actually be deleted though.

Edit: Also revoke your consent to store your sample if you allowed that.

101
Phoenixzreply
lemmy.ca

Yeah good luck with that.

I doubt they'd actually delete data now. Who are you going to sue if they don't? They're bankrupt and they'll just pull a "oh we forgot to delete it!"

They need these samples and data to be sold off to pay off a lot of groups so I honestly don't believe they'll delete anything

If your brother or even cousin did a test it's about good enough to be applied to you too for a lot of cases so yay, so much fun about human DNA databases now being available to the highest bidder.

Who would bid? Maybe America's new Nazi's would like an insight in their racial purity? So many fun ideas!

That company should be burned down to the ground

25

That company should be burned down to the ground

Seems like they did a pretty good job of burning themselves to the ground.

8
lemm.ee

Church of Latter Day Saints will probably buy it. They believe they can convert the dead.

15
jaybonereply
lemmy.world

They can’t possibly be that stupid. I’m sure they have more sinister plans for these geneology databases. My first guess would be blackmail. But I’m guessing they have a ton of other evil ideas.

4
lemm.ee

LDS has a ton of money. They already have some kind of deal with ancestry.com and own familysearch.com.

8

Yeah even before those websites existed, they were collecting all kinds of files on people. Like late 80s, early 90s. Warehouses full of paper records.

6

It's more a matter of crazy than stupid, I think.

1