Spyke

thelemmy.club's Nazi bar problem: defederation worthy? [problem resolved]


FINAL UPDATE

@bdonvr, admin of The Lemmy Club has, in my opinion, responded in good faith to the concerns raised in this post, and so I have withdrawn my proposal for defederation. In summary:

  1. They will no longer be allowing conservative/right wing communities on their instance
  2. A couple of accounts were banned ( marathon and Bernard )
  3. "realcaseyrollins decided to voluntarily close /c/[email protected], /c/[email protected], and /c/[email protected]."

Personally, I think this is just about the ideal outcome, and I hope this will convince folks to give The Lemmy Club another chance.


The Lemmy Club is currently suffering from "The Nazi Bar" problem. All of their top communities are run by three right-wingers as illustrated below.

The Lemmy Club instance admin doesn't seem to want to ban them, for the reasons mentioned below:

This vote is on whether or not we should defederate from this instance until they address their Nazi Bar problem.

Upvote = for defederation. Downvote = against defederation.

Edit: As others have mentioned, happy to treat this a only a temporary measure until the problem is resolved.

Edit 2: The Lemmy Club admin has said they will implement a rule against right wing communities, and has taken action on some problematic posts and users (see original comments below).

I'm willing to extend the benefit of the doubt to the admin here, as they have responded in good faith:

If you implement those changes then I’d be willing to withdraw the defederation proposal and consider the problem resolved.

View original on lemmy.dbzer0.com
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/flatworm7591

This is a simple majority vote. The current tally is as follows:

  • For: (4), (3), (1), (8)
  • Against:
  • Local Community: +0.8
  • Outsider sentiment: Supportive
  • Total: +16.8
  • Percentage: 100.00%

This vote will complete in 10.74 hours


Reminder that this is a pilot process and results of voting are not set in stone.

55
topherclayreply
lemmy.world

These images are insane on my mobile Connect app. it's eight screen lengths of scrolling to get to the reply button just for this one comment.

19
db0reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

yo need to contact the developer of you app and ask them to handle and resize lemmy emojis properly. They can be identified by their markdown code as they all have a special emoji string assigned like so "emoji vouched"

This is how they look on tesseract:

15
lemmy.world

Also looks like this in Sync. Maybe instead of every app needing to fix your images, you should just fix your images?

5

My images are already "fixed". Those clients don't follow the lemmy standard for emojis.

5

Sync isn't being maintained actively anymore, and I think this emoji standard was added after the last sync update (pretty sure as a response to hexbear federating with their emojis)

I have sync too, i haven't bothered to find a new app yet but maybe it's time.

2
MathGruntreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I'm confused on how to vote. The vote tally shows for/against, and then "outsider sentiment support", and I'm not sure what that is, and also who and how gets to vote.

Also, I'd like to vote and that's what I really care about.

Defederate that shit quick.

I'm not sure if it's possible, but ban/block those accounts as well. Too bad we can't do more about preventing those cancerous people from doing more damage.

MathGr

Edit: I take back my unofficial vote to defederate. We should wait and see.

Also, lots of love out to our Admins here for (1) noticing this, (2) attempting to rectify and and (3) being reasonable (i.e. not using a sledgehammer) when it seems that appropriate steps have been taken at this time.

However, having seen this right-wing cancer destroy other social media platforms, I want to stress that we should be as proactive and ban-happy as we feel appropriate, because this shit is not going away.

2
db0reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

You vote by simply up/down voting as usual. Check the sidebar of this comm.

5

These users were not pointed out in this or the prior post and have now been banned. I don't tolerate that kind of stuff but these were basically zero point, zero interaction posts that had not been reported to me.

8
bdonvrreply
thelemmy.club

The user in question has never faced moderation action from db0.

-1
bdonvrreply
thelemmy.club

I had not taken action against these posts because they had not been reported and had not garnered enough interest or interaction to have been seen by me organically until now. That is not one of my users but they have been banned.

After further consideration I've removed any explicitly conservative comms from my instance as I don't feel I can effectively moderate them or leave them be.

3

I didn't know this from the title and since the posts didn't get any traction or reports I did not look into it at the time.

The moment I had this info the posts were removed and the (outside) user banned. I don't tolerate that shit.

I'm writing a longer comment when I get a moment at a keyboard about my removal of the comm as a whole.

1
db0
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I would have preferred a vote first to see if we should just ban those comms, or defederate. If we ban those comms and the right-wingers, we can take a more "surgical" approach. Personally I will vote against, in favour or B&B (block & ban). But I am open to be convinced otherwise if the problem is worse than I thought.

Edit: After the revelation that there's literal neonazis posting neonazi videos in there already, I switch my vote to defed.

31

I thought about that, but tbh I also wanted to put pressure on the admin to take action against the right wing communities and community bans would not have achieved that.

17
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I agree with your surgical approach in general, though I don't want to vote one way or another in this case, because I'm torn between whether it's a good idea, or too soon to act so broadly.

Despite Lemmy and the fediverse at large being an international community, I would predict a very American style community schism at some point based on political ideology. I think we're going to end up with a conservative zone, a liberal/progressive zone, a tankie zone, and then... Instances like this one. They're "neutral", they will have to experience the Nazi bar problem before they either take action or put on an armband.

db0, you know the tech better than I do. Is this sort of thing possible? Fractured and semi exclusive fediverse zones that are connected very loosely by neutral parties?

I honestly don't know if it's a good thing, but I definitely understand the sentiment of not wanting to interact with whatever American conservatives have become.

5
db0reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Not really connected. If we defed a fash instance, we can't see them in a "neutral" space either.

9
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Gotcha, thanks.

I feel like we're gonna head towards that community schism sooner rather than later. I'm glad for you that the decision doesn't lie solely in your hands thanks to the governance system. Hang in there.

2

Thank you both for the great read.

My initial reaction was "defed", but now that I've seen this back-and-forth, I'm going to remove it and stay neutral in the b&b camp as well.

Signed, Another (mostly) lurker

5
bdonvrreply
thelemmy.club

These were two posts by a non-user of my instance that had zero points or comments. They had not been reported to me until now and I have promptly banned them and removed their content. I do not now nor have ever tolerated such content.

Although this content has garnered near zero "community" or interaction on my instance I have decided that I cannot effectively moderate nor leave conservative communities be and have therefore removed them.

I hope that this addresses any concerns you or your userbase may have. Please report anything like that you see - it is possible otherwise that I may miss it.

3
db0reply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

But this is part of the problem, you have to see that, right? The fact that you have literal neonazi content and nobody is bothering to even report it to you, means that those comms are too far gone. Before fascists can thrive in a community, you need to have a large silent majority which are ok with fascist content.

We also can't be responsible for moderating your instance. We can maybe point one or two examples, but eventually we'll have to label the whole instance as unsalvageable.

I saw in your other updates that you removed some of these comms and have added some rules and this is good, but this is also a time to be vigilant on your own, at least for a while.

5

The comms were essentially dead. It's hard to say anything 'thrived' there. The posts in question had zero interaction. Of course it's concerning it was there at all however these were not "communities" where any kind of discussion happened. 2 people would've made a large silent majority of people who were actually browsing in these comms on a weekly basis.

If this had been somewhere where people actually made comments or posted more than a handful of times a month (there were 12 posts and 6 comments in the entire history of the comm) - I'm sure I would have identified and taken action earlier. Additionally, they were both video posts. It's entirely possible nobody ever clicked on them to watch them and I don't know these videos by title and did not realize what they were, and without further action to prompt me I did not look further into them.

Of course I will be more vigilant going forward.

4

I mostly lurk but I'm with the B&B approach for now.

If it starts to spread to other comms on the instance, it'd be worth taking another look at defederation.

2

Defederate.

I understand why the owner of the instance finds our reaction distasteful, but unfortunately, we have no choice but to defederate from an instance whose largest community is run by this individual.

This is a governance community, meant for decisions (such as, should we be federated with a specific instance), not a diplomacy community. We don't vote on "should we ask the owner of this instance to actually moderate in ways we find tolerable"? The unfortunate truth here is that instance is currently mostly this kind of garbage, so until it isn't, defederation.

(Also I spent an hour trawling this individual's comments to make sure of my opinion because I have ADHD and can't stop myself, and while my normal reaction is surgical, this is too conveniently a case where every individual involved could have been acting in bad faith. Better to be thorough here than not.)

18

For a culture of tolerance to flourish then the intolerant must be purged. I love freedom of speech but Nazis should be given no quarter for their ideologies to metastasize into the rest of the fediverse.

16

I'm for temporary defederation if the admin does not react to an ultimatum to clean house. Being federated means increasing the reach of their message, and the message is hate. If Xitter was worth banning, then this is too.

The admin seems caught in the tolerance paradoxon, and doesn't realize that his inaction is an indirect endorsement of the content he's hosting. Seems to be too nice for his own good, maybe a warning cannon salvo is in order.

14
thelemmy.club

If I have to choose between this user and federation with db0 I would side with db0.

However I must comment frankly that moving immediately to defederation over a thread in which the subject - @[email protected] - has never been the subject of db0 moderation action (with over 4k combined comments and posts over 6 months) in some attempt to strongarm me into action is, at minimum, distasteful.

Trust me, I'm a card carrying Communist party member. I do not care for conservative views at all. But I did not create The Lemmy Club to be a partisan instance - but a general instance to replace reddit. I do of course have limits, however in reviewing the posting history of @[email protected] I do not find anything worthy of banning. I do not like some of the sources they post. But they also post non-conservative stories and sources as well and generally conduct themselves in a reasonable manner in all posts and comments. They do not appear to me to be some wild-MAGA idiot, although they do seem to be conservative. They post unfavorable things about Trump fairly often. The fact that it has come to this is to me, a bit bizarre.

Thanks for having this open to outside comments, though.

14

The problem is all your top communities are run by these right wing guys. I know you probably don't want to have to trawl through every post, and neither do I. But shit attracts flies.

You should be made aware, for example, that the user who posted this https://thelemmy.club/post/23635160 and this https://thelemmy.club/post/23387257 in "Right Wing Videos" is a literal neo-nazi (see his Mastadon post profile here: https://friends.ravergram.club/@Bernard). I'm sure if we dig around some more there will be many more examples.

Unfortunately we can see where things are headed because we already had to deal with instances like exploding heads. I think that, while the mods themselves seem well behaved enough to not get reported, they are effectively acting as cover for the more unsavoury characters that right wing instances invariably attract.

Unless you want to spend all your time checking those communities, I just think you're better off without them. You are right that jumping straight to a defed vote is a bit harsh maybe, but I think if we just blocked the communities then there would be no real pressure on you to take any further action, and personally I think it would be better for the fediverse to not have right wing content platformed.

12
bdonvrreply
thelemmy.club

Okay now see this stuff is actionable, Forgive me for not noticing this earlier, I did not know about these documentaries by name, and being that they were zero point, zero comment posts with no reports I had not seen it. The (non Lemmy Club) user that posted them has been banned with content removed. Additionally after some investigation site user Marathon started posting some stuff of that sort recently. Also banned them for apparently being a ban-evasion account and using their alts for vote manipulation. The communities that they moderated have been removed.

I would much prefer a report over a post like this one to fix these kind of issues. If they're posts like these were - essentially zero interaction posts that go nowhere - it's possible I may miss them.

I think I will have to make a new rule against "right wing" communities. I don't think I have the capacity to moderate them due to my own viewpoint, and I can't be hands off without risking them devolving. I won't be banning the previously mentioned user, but I will remove their communities that are conservative-themed and not allow them to moderate in such a way to only allow such sources.

I think this will address the issue.

11

Honestly, that all sounds quite reasonable to me, and seems like a good faith response to my original complaint. Thank you for responding in the way you did.

If you implement those changes then I'd be willing to withdraw the defederation proposal and consider the problem resolved.

9
thelemmy.club

I appreciate this. And if you ever feel that I start to become a problem please DM me, I'm not afraid to move instances so as not to harm an instance's reputation, I have done so in the past.

0

After some consideration I don't think - as sole admin - with such a difference in ideology, I can effectively moderate conservative communities on The Lemmy Club. I will have to remove communities like "Right Wing Videos" and others. Although I haven't seen anything that rises to the level of "neo-nazi" from you, I have seen some of it posted to communities of yours by others, and so I can't be hands-off either. I also have gotten and seen too many comments that our community list is off-putting to be comfortable with it. Thanks for being understanding and level-headed.

Edit: after more thought, my final wording on the rule is this:

"Users or communities that, in the view of the admin team, jeopardize the good standing of The Lemmy Club with other instances may be removed."

It is more vague than I'd like. But allows me the flexibility to take action when needed without devolving into arguments about what's "too right wing" if I had explicitly banned right wing comms, and applicable to more situations.

6
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I read the comments here, starting from the perspective that merely being a "conservative" was no reason for defederation (I have a 1990s idea of what the word "conservative" means), then it turns out we're talking about people posting Nazi shit at will and it staying up, which definitelly justifies defederation and the "Nazi bar" label, but apparently (from his own participation here) the Admin of the instance is willing to ban the Nazi types and possibly the groups in that instance which were ok with Nazi posts.

If the admin does this, then I'm against defederation, if not then I'm in favour of defederation. Sadly I can't encode such a view in just a Yay or Nay metric (i.e. upvote/downvote), hence I will neither upvote nor downvote and instead am leaving my rationale here as a post.

13

I think temporary defederation is sensible.

Sure, you dbzer0 admins could play whack-a-mole with the right-wingers attracted to that instance, and your users could play it too... but come on, too much effort. Specially because I expect your users to gravitate heavily towards anarchism, so this sort of "democracy doesn't work!" muppet will likely rub them off the wrong way.

Also, didn't dbzer0 ban Twitter links? I remember you guys were voting on something like this. If you did, then defederating thelemmy.club is even more sensible, as it's consistent with previous decisions.

(Just my two cents. I'm not from this instance, I don't even know if I can vote [I probably can't].)

11

never heard of the instance before, never seen any of their content or posting. If it's problematic by all means, defederate them, but then i would also think the instance admin would ban them as well.

Otherwise maybe we should watch with apprehension until something happens?

The nazi bar problem is a real problem, but so much as the nazi bar problem is real, there is also the anti-nazi bar. The bar that invents and creates nazis, just to kick them out of the bar, to ensure there are no nazis. It's not really an easy problem to solve.

i'd be more concerned if they were doing the hexbear thing where they started infiltrating other instances and causing problems there. Personally, don't really care if they exist in a vacuum though. Assuming they don't cause any problems.

8

Voting against defederation. I’d prefer we have a clear protocol of escalation: let people block those communities, if it gets egregious and we start seeing hex style brigading or continuous support for bans, consider an instance wide community ban, then go for full defederation

Haven't seen enough of it on main to warrant hair-trigger actions IMO

“Keep a weather eye and steady as she goes”

8

I don't think this is a Nazi bar problem just yet. I have not really seen any heinous comment on Lemmy so far and I spend too much time on here. We can always defederate later if this instance gets out of hand.

Voting against defederation.

8
lemmy.dbzer0.com

If I understand federation in lemmy correctly, we wouldn't see comments and posts from the users from lemmy.club in communities on other instances too, right?

I'm absolutely in favour of doing something about it, but defederation as a first step seems to be a bit too much, even if it is temporary.

8

Having not actually run into any of the mentioned nazi content myself, I don't feel personally invested in defederation.

I personally prefer for the nazis to be clustered together in one corner so that it's easy to mute or block them without their knowledge, and I do have some apprehension against defederating this early and causing them to scatter into wind on other instances.

If any of those comms they're moderating actually have nazi content, it should be an easy decision to cut them lose since we have a vested interest in keeping that shit off our servers, but if the fear is simply that the right-lean of the comms may create a place for nazis to gather then I might be on the side of waiting for signs of infection before amputation.

7
thelemmy.club

@bdonvr, admin of The Lemmy Club here. I'd like to provide an update and some comments.

What went wrong:

One prolific user (realcaseyrollins) of my instance has created several communities and is usually one of the only submitters to their own communities. The posts in them generally garner very little interaction but once in a while hit some main feeds and get a few comments. One such post by this user to the (relatively) largest community, /c/[email protected], was a link to a Breitbart article. The content and headline of the article was not particularly objectionable, but as one user pointed out, Breitbart is a terrible news source whose use should be discouraged. The aforemenioned moderator of the community removed the comment citing a rule they had: "Using the Poisoning The Well fallacy to attack sources shared in a post is presently not allowed (this rule may change in the future, and isolated instances will not subject you to a permanent ban)". This sparked a post to /c/yepowertrippinbastards.

I have previously checked into this user's post history and comments and although I don't agree with them politically (or in the way that they moderate), they did not appear to me to be an extreme MAGA/neo-nazi type and was otherwise reasonable in interactions with others, so I did not ban them. I saw it like this - if you don't like their little news community, use one of the many other communities on the fediverse. Such is the strength of our platform. The one moderated by this user would continue to languish in obscurity.

After some interaction with db0 staff in that thread it was pointed out to me that many of my instance's "top" communities were right-wing or adjacent to that kind of thing. This is something I was aware of and not at all fond of. I had already been debating removing several before this. The only reason I hadn't was that all of these communities were essentially dead. The posts in them barely ever got more than 2-3 votes, and comments even rarer still. I was more hoping that some more normal communities would take hold here and just drown them out. We are a very small instance. But seeing my defense of not immediately banning realcaseyrollins and the community list a db0 admin then moved to open this thread.

As realcaseyrollins was the only point of discussion so far, I made a comment saying that the issue presented thus far were not worthy of defederation talk. After some more discussion it was pointed out to me that there were two videos posted to my instance which were very much explicit neo-nazi propaganda. I had not seen these posts because they were made to the very much dead (no more than a dozen posts in it's six month history) because they garnered basically no votes, no comments, and had not been reported to me until now. I also would not have known by the title of the videos without looking into it further. The posts were made by an outside user.

What I have done to address it.

I do not tolerate nazis or their ilk, nor will I ever. The moment I was made aware of this the two posts were promptly removed and the user banned.

Furthermore I had discovered one user of my instance - @marathon - who had been posting things that weren't so explicitly awful but trending that way. After careful inspections of their posts and comments I discovered that they were ban evading from other instances and upvoting their own posts with alts. They were also banned and all of their communities were removed.

After further consideration of some of the commentary here by users and admins I decided that I could not be host to any communities that were conservative/right wing. Even if they did not reach the level of neo-nazi. I am very much a leftist. I was never comfortable with these communities but I did not create The Lemmy Club to be a partisan instance. I had not removed them to date because they were small and dead and was hoping they'd amount to nothing rather than having to foray into actively moderating on an ideological basis. Some of that is definitely naivety on my part. In theory I don't have too much of a problem with communities that aren't politically aligned with my personal views existing on my instance (to a point, of course). I made The Lemmy Club as a general instance. But I now realize, as sole admin of the site, that I can't effectively moderate any such community centered around politics that differ from my own to that extent. I can't be hands off in case it becomes more extremist either. So I have implemented a new site-wide rule: "Users or communities that, in the view of the admin team, jeopardize the good standing of The Lemmy Club with other instances may be removed.". This allows me broader, more generic power than a rule explicitly banning "right-wing" communities, and entirely avoids the debate of what constitutes "too right wing" while accomplishing the same thing. After implementing this rule I moved to remove all communities that are themed around these kinds of politics.

In addition, after seeing this thread - and with no prompting from me - realcaseyrollins has decided to voluntarily close /c/[email protected], /c/[email protected], and /c/[email protected].

I hope this addresses any concerns that you might have.

A few comments on the situation.

I started this instance because I was excited by the fediverse and wanted to contribute. I pay, personally, hundreds of dollars a year to run this site and provide space to some users in the fediverse. With the generosity of a few of my users half of my costs are now covered by them. This is something I think both the db0 team and I share, though their operation and contribution to the fediverse have been far larger than mine, which I commend. We are a very small instance. We are not pushing for growth for growths sake. I think with this in mind and the interactions you've had with me thus far have shown that I'm a reasonable person who is more than willing to engage in dialogue.

With that said I really am not fond of the way this whole situation came about. I would have very much appreciated a PM or message on Element before taking such a drastic step. I don't think that this strongarming was at all necessary. I believe such actions should follow an escalation process. The scope of the issue should be taken into account in this as well, as far as actual neo-nazi posts we're talking about two, to a dead comm, that got no interaction. A quick report and I would have immediately banned the user and removed the posts, and probably have just went ahead and removed the community as well. Or we could've continued discussion on /c/yepowertrippinbastards. Not that I have an issue addressing issues publicly, but the title of this thread will make it seem to many users (and let's face it, we're mostly ex-redditors here. Most of us read way too much into headlines and don't read further) that The Lemmy Club is some right-wing instance full of unsavory crap. I mean the governance comm on db0 has only ever had seven total posts and this is one. Gotta be pretty bad right? And that impression will not go away very easy. Just the suggestion that db0 should defederate would signal to most people that the instance is toxic and the problem quite serious and that the admins had probably already attempted dialogue that went nowhere. And that upsets me because that is not the case at all, and does actively harm this small little project that I've put in a lot of time and personal effort into. We all want to help build the fediverse. Let's work together in a constructive manner, that's all I ask.

Thanks for reading,

@bdonvr, sole admin of thelemmy.club

6

Thanks for making this post. It was great to get your side of the story.

I acknowledge I pushed pretty hard on this topic, mostly because in the related YPTB post you didn't seem very open to taking action initially. We are trying to practice open governance on this instance with direct input from the community, so I thought the best thing in this case was just to ask the community to weigh in. What is telling is that, even without providing much context other than the top communities list, the vast majority of our instance members clearly already knew it was a right wing instance judging by the voting.

But to be honest, I think your reputational concerns are mostly unfounded. The way I see it, your instance already had a bad reputation for being a right-wing instance simply because of the communities and mods that set up shop there. That's kind of how this all came about. However, the way you responded to the situation has been great, and anyone reading this post would be able to see that the problem has been dealt with, and that you seem like a genuinely nice person. That can only help your instance's reputation in the long run, I would think. And now hopefully you have a fresh start.

5
bdonvrreply
thelemmy.club

I'm confused by your voting system. Did these not count or does that symbol mean they don't have voting rights?

1

See the sidebar, specifically About voting rights and flairs. Those flairs mean those members mentioned a pirate in their application, and their votes count towards the "local community" sentiment. 100% of members with voting rights voted for defederation.

What I'm planning to do is to edit the very top of the post with a short TLDR so that anyone stumbling on the post later can see at a glance that the problem has been dealt with, and that we are not defederating from your instance. Would you be happy with that approach?

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Pro temporary defederation. They seem to have removed the 'Right Wing Videos' community, though?

4
zr0
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Defederation means censorship. If I, as an individual, have a problem with communities, I can block them. I like to keep that choice under my own control. So I vote for: No Defederation.

4

no need to repeat reddit's mistakes

im sure any community they have that is worth being connected could be remade here right?

im pretty new here and came from reddit as im tired of dealing with right wing assholes

3

I vote to defederate since this is a big problem but we also could simply remove all affected communities and ban the right wingers who control those communities. Though I can understand why defederation is warranted and also desired in this case.

3
lemmy.dbzer0.com

-- edited to clarify the mob rule comment

I really appreciate the discussion, this will be my wordy take.

I am actively against needing to selectively ban individual communities. This may open up to a form of 'policing', or encouraging hunter-seekers and dogged flag raisers. It is lazy administration to ask another instance to moderate on your behalf, lets not go there.

Defederation, whilst the nuclear option, could be seen as seeking some form of regime change or that spooky governance from a distance. If this appears more and more in need of attention, disproportionate to overall growth, we may need to have a different discussion. That said, it is the purpose and power of a federation.

Are there any ways we can deduce if 'actors' are going out there and polluting other instances intentionally? Reddit bot farms come to mind. Can we see if other trusted instances feel the same?

Finally, I would hope this doesnt become some sort of (likely well intended) mob rule as a consequence of the above. We must have clear rules on how and when, what tips the scales, as this could become a trigger happy habit.

Maintaining a new community without prior experience may be tough, so supporting other instances might be all that is needed.

Concerns must be communicated - with evidence - and shown how they go against our rules/conduct/ethos whatever. Seek clarification from the admins if any actions or steps will be taken. If nothing changes after a period of time then defederation is the way to go. A notice board of some sort communicating this publically with the what has been done taken above and hopefully see organic change in the future.

Do it.

2
lemmy.world

I think the nazi bar analogy is dumb. The story it is based on reminds me of those old facebook memes where the one christian student stands up to their atheist college professor and then everybody claps.

The main reason I think it's dumb though is that the term "nazi" seems to mean a multitude of different things to different people. Then you add to that the instinct people have to hyperbolise online and almost any instance could be a "nazi bar".

What do most people in this thread think lemmy.world is?

Edit:

It took me so long to understand the semantics of the emojis here. Like I thought land lubber might be a new insult that I'd not heard of instead of an instance outsider. I found this thread on all and clicked through without understanding it was an internal instance debate. Apologies for wading into your private debate... idk how private this is but I guess you can't hide threads on activitypub.

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I say defederate-until, but I'd like the procedure of defederation to be more grounded in routine so that motivation is conveyed.

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Voting against, as I don't believe that jumping directly to talk of defederation is the best option. This stance by OP, along with their suggested method of handling the recent blahaj-related posts to YPTB, gives me pause with regards to their admin status. They have not crossed the line into authoritarian behavior or admin abuse, but it does feel that they are toeing that line.

It is good and justified to spotlight these issues and bring them up for discussion and consensus, which is what OP has done in both cases, but I question the extreme suggestions made in each circumstance.

0
MathGruntreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I like what you said but I strongly disagree. We are not some agency that should hesitate via "guilt by association" when it comes to Nazi or similar right-wing ideology. It is not a slippery slope.

The amount of money spent by nation-states used to prop up these organizations and their ideologies, who are then responsible for misinformation that results in political power shifts that has destabilized the world makes it simple for me.

People are actually dying because of this misinformation, and it is a clear MO to take over social media platforms. Controlling this bot-infestation tactic is impossible, but mitigating of such influence on Lemmy it is absolutely necessary.

So yes, absolutely either defederate or otherwise get rid of any Nazi.

Quick edit: I take back most of what I said above. I'll leave it there for posterity.

What I mean by "take it back". The admin over there (I can't quite see his name... my eyes are not great) is trying to grow his community and didn't realize how bad some of that actually was. The final screenshot DB0 mentions that it seems reasonable at this time to hold off, since the account were banned. For now.

I'm a lurker at heart, but I'll subscribe over there a try to post some things that are not harmful to the social structure. I tried something like that when Voat started up years ago,and it didn't go so well, but Voat had bigger problems.

2

You seem to have come to the same conclusion I did, in a sense, but via a different route: the first option, imo, is to alert the instance admin as to what is going on within their instance. If they are unaware, they cannot stamp it out.

After they've been made aware, if they either choose to actively or passively condone such behavior then defederation is called for. If they continually "slip up" and such content falls through the cracks repeatedly after they've been made aware, that would also be grounds for defederation.

My stance is that the first course of action should be to actively push these bad actors out of spaces that they seek to take over rather than leave those spaces to them.

2
lemmy.ml

db0 isn't my home, but my 2¢:

Balkanization will be the death of Lemmy.

Most new lemmings don't know which server they should join when they come from Reddit. Many don't even understand Federation in the first place. Users that pick the "wrong" instance are collateral damage. Non-toxic communities get caught in the crossfire. It might even discourage servers from allowing political communities at all, since they present a risk of defederation. An already small community becomes smaller.

Also, the "Nazi Bar" problem (imo) should be reserved for fascists and bigots specifically, not all right-wing content in general: fascists because of the Paradox of Tolerance, and bigots because they're mutually exclusive with the targets of their bigotry.

Can't you just block specific communities, or de-list the server from search instead?

0

"wrong" instance are collateral damage.

Switching instances is almost trivial. I think you're overblowing things. They're not anymore collateral damage than getting permabanned from reddit because they wrote "Luigi"

Also, the "Nazi Bar" problem (imo) should be reserved for fascists and bigots specifically, not all right-wing content in general: fascists because of the Paradox of Tolerance, and bigots because they're mutually exclusive with the targets of their bigotry.

The whole point of the Nazi bar story is to point out that you can't let in "polite fascists" like the alt-right either. We saw that clearly in this instance, where a community about "right wing videos" which is supposed to be reasonable, ended up hosting literal neo-nazi videos and nobody reported it.

4
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Are we just lumping in right wing with Nazi like they do left wing with commie?

Not a rational comparison because of how insanely far right the overton window has shifted.

Women's rights? Left wing

LGBTQ+ rights? Left wing

Anti-genocide? Left wing.

Love your neighbor? Left wing.

Feed the hungry? Help the poor? Left wing.

Fiscal responsibility? Believe it or not, left wing.

Personal accountability? Left wing now too.

Respect rule of law and the Constitution? Left fucking wing.

The overton window is so far moved that nothing is left for the right wing short of "xenophobic nationalism".

9

When it comes to actual normal Americans, they mostly desire left wing or progressive values.

Conservative (incl Russian) media has done a thoroughly good job of grooming the majority of Americans into either

  1. Voting farthest right, even if they have more left wing ideals

  2. Not voting at all

Which successfully moves the overton window further right every election.

There are very many leftists in America, they just aren't capable of getting a win, because they long ago lost the information war.

1

I reaaaally like this comment, and I hate that it’s now true in so many places.

3

I think that description misses a reason for the problem being the specific tactics and mindset of Nazis and how cultish and exclusionary they are themselves (ie. active contempt for the concept of tolerance). If it was so broad as to mean "people with X opinions/interests are widely disliked, we'll be more popular if we kick them out", to me that seems like a much less reasonable position and a different thing.

1
lemm.ee

I don't think it's anyone's business what people want to talk about on the internet, as long as they are doing nothing illegal. I can understand an owner of an instance maybe not wanting everyone who uses their server to have opposite political views to them, but everyone else should mind their own business, or maybe actually talk to those people they disagree with, instead of calling them the N word. If I don't like something enough, I just block it from my own feed and go on about my day.

-12
ysjetreply
lemmy.world

Please read up on the Paradox of Tolerance.

18
megane-kunreply
lemmy.dbzer0.com

You're replying to a bot that marks the top-level responses with a flair. You're marked with a "landlubber" flair used for those responses coming from users from outside the instance.

2