Spyke
lemmy.world

You know, for a free speech supporter, he sure seems to hate it when people speak freely.

217
wewbullreply
feddit.uk

He wants to speak freely, but he doesn't want to afford anyone else the same right.

It's not an uncommon stance, but it's a hypocritical one.

98

Not really true. His supporters are allowed to speak freely as well.

9
feddit.dk

Only the cool kids know where to get FOSS.

114
treadfulreply
lemmy.zip

Their backend is closed source.

[EDIT: Incorrect, see below]

5
treadfulreply
lemmy.zip

Thanks for the correction. That's pretty rad. Now I'm wondering if that's a wrong memory or if it was released in the last few years.

8

There was a fuss a while back since the released source appeared to be waaaay out of date compared to what was being used.

They came out and said that they wanted the usernames feature to be developed fully before it got pushed public. Which they then did.

7
lemmy.ca

They also block any content, even private messages that contain Bluesky for example.

65
hddsxreply
lemmy.ca

Time to create redsky, yellowsky, and pinksky URL forwarders

32
Probiusreply
sopuli.xyz

I think we need laws against platforms censoring discussion of their rivals, particularly with shadow bans and shadow delistings.

14
lemmy.ca

You wish. It's not gonna happen with these douchebags in power.

11

like anti-competitive laws? We have those. They tend to rely on certain people enforcing them though

4
sopuli.xyz

I was waiting for such endorsement, maybe my friends will switch now.

60

In kinda pissed with them not agreeing to the chat app interoperability protocolo though, i want to delete whatsapp so bad...

3
lemmy.world

Been using Signal for years. Love it.

Makes sense than an anti-free speech dipshit like Elon Musk would oppose it.

37

saying there are unspecified "known vulnerabilities" within Signal

His source: Trust me bro

19

Not really. It's still not big. It definitely got bigger after he supported it though.

3
lemmy.world

It's not easy to leave WhatsApp. I've transitioned to Signal a month ago and lost contact with a lot of people. My friends and family think I'm going crazy for attitudes like these. "You can't change the world on your own".. like that was the plan 😅

Thanks Musk, that was the motivation I needed to keep away from WhatsApp.

Obviously not a X/Twitter user, I'm not a fkin idiot.

29
o_arguidoreply
lemmy.world

It varies, I guess. Some people might not be able to leave due to their job for example.

I left, it's an option for me. And I'm not coming back, I don't want to admit defeat.

I'm in an island now, it's annoying how these companies penetrated our lives.

7
lemm.ee

If someone is only willing to communicate with you through WhatsApp, they don't value your friendship.

1

If someone is not technical enough tk use Signal or Telegram they are not my friends. But not everyone I communicate with is my friend.

1

It’s a slow and constant process of onboarding people to signal. I managed to onboard my local gaming group into using Signal after Trump got elected.

3

I managed to get my parents and brother to switch to signal two years ago, never switched back and it's always working, very easy to use. I'm pretty sure whatsapp will enshitify at such a rate that signal will absorb the users.

2

Keep on pushing, I've been transitioning to Signal and now I've got a handful of good friends on there. People are realising what's going on but be mindful that a lot of people have businesses and work that depend on it.. They are hostages. But if everyone changes gradually it will reach a point they won't be anymore. Keep on preaching brother!

1
Xedreply

I’ve never used whats app and I never plan to. Recently I’ve been trying Line for messaging my family abroad and I like how it’s a Japanese/ Korean app so I can get away from American corporations

1

Here are some workarounds:

  1. Don't use Xitter
  2. Use your phone number
  3. Use a URL shortener

He's not doing anything except getting more bad press for himself.

26
lemmy.world

I've blocked Twitter on my Adguard Home DNS already last year, so no "X" shit in my house/our mobile devices anywhere.

18
discuss.tchncs.de

I don't think it is a good idea to block twitter completely. Some countries use twitter for official announcements, including emergency warning.

-11
vandsjovreply
feddit.dk

That’s a weird reason to keep using X. Hopefully these places also does other forms of communications, otherwise it’s a sad state of affairs.

11

They do have other ways such as SMS if it is critical, but most people simply share the twitter link via WhatsApp and you can be more updated by using twitter. Most people haven't moved to Bluesky or Mastodon, so if there is flooding or heavy rain most people will share updates on their location via twitter and WhatsApp like for example flooded streets.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3355402.3355408

https://redlib.ducks.party/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1hrgu3u/amber_alert_with_details_gated_behind_a_twitter/

1
Kokeshreply
lemmy.world

My country doesn't and hopefully others will follow.

7

It's always a good idea to block racist platforms lorded over by a troll who will delete comments that oppose him.

3
semreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

They have a pattern of trying something and seeing how far they can get. Then they'll say it was an oversight or a joke.

Someone recently called it similar to "reconnaissance in force" by the military -- you go out with an uncommitted force and learn from the kind of resistance you get so you can be more effective.

The point is "mistakes" like these are not benign, or at least should not be treated as benign, since we can't ever really know for sure.

2

Yeah. I thought it was important context that they had backpedalled, but I did not intend to downplay the severity of the issue.

2
friendica.world

@cyrano The "problem" (actually, the feature) with those censorship algorithms is that they rely a lot on the "exact contents" of the message ("Scunthorpe Problem"), so X is probably programmed to detect the Signal's domain and block due to the presence of such link (similar to how Facebook was/is blocking links to the largest PixelFed instances, and then they also decided to block links to DistroWatch and official websites from various Linux distros), so it's not programmed (yet) to censor just the "hexadecimal/base64/whatever" portion of the link alone. And there's where Tox could shine: a handle is literally a hexadecimal sequence, without Tox's domains, without URI Schemas, just a bunch of digits and letters from A to F.

I don't know why Tox isn't mentioned as a "instant messaging platform for whistleblowers": it got Onion (Tor) tunneling possibility (as well as tunneling it through I2P outproxies because it actually accepts any kind of SOCKS5 proxy), it's registration-less (even Matrix needs registration) so it's effectively anonymous IMO.

SimpleX seems to be that, too, although I didn't have the opportunity to use it more than I used Tox. But from the little I've used it, it's similar to Signal in the sense that it's a link (and a large link) and not simply a hash/hex sequence.

12

Sounds like that censorship conservatives are all up in a row about... Oh not anymore fancy that

11
lemmy.world

I would really like to know who is using 'X' now ? I mean apart from Musk and his bot army

9
TWB0109reply
lemmy.one

A lot of people unfortunately. Specially people outside the US, I think mastodon is ready for people to switch, but nobody does, the most they do is switch to bluesky

5

Unfortunately fedverse isn't really ready for the general population, it's why so many people flocked to bluesky over mastodon. I know I prefer blueskys UI and features over what Mastodon has to offer.

Though Tumblr is planning to enter the fedverse so maybe that'll help somehow.

2
TWB0109reply
lemmy.one

Yeah idk, maybe I’m not that much of a micro blogger, i was never a twitter/tumblr user, so mastodon is kind of new to me, so I don’t miss any features. As far as UI, I believe most mastodon instances look pretty good, just not a twitter carbon copy like Bluesky, but that’s a matter of taste.

I believe the biggest problem is “clout” or following, with likes and boosts and stuff like that not being properly federated most of the time, people simply can not “grow”

1
semreply
lemmy.blahaj.zone

One thing I did recently was search mastodon for some "normal" topics like fashion and yoga, but I didn't find much.

The nice thing about Mastodon and ActivityPub is that they're designed for the long run, and don't need profits to be successful. So they can have slow growth year over year and still survive and slowly build up a user base that gradually adds more and more topics to attract more people.

2

Yeh that’s a big problem too. People on Mastodon are mostly IT/Technical people and maybe musicians, some artists and a lot of activists.

I hope at some point people understand that Bluesky is basically the same as twitter, and at some point, the company can become evil.

But yea h, activitypub is pretty much immortal haha

2

Unfortunately, a lot of official government services and representatives are still using it. I saw someone reference a Twitter post about that Canadian plane crash, for instance.

3

Dude most European heads of state and institutions have Xitter accounts and just kept on using them.. It's a disgrace..

2

Lots of people still use it, obviously musk fans, people who actually make a living off of content creation it's hard to move a entire fandom to a new platform. People who aren't from the US probably don't care about the whole mess and stick around because everyone they know is still on the platform.

1
Tirereply

A bunch of undecided voter types that pay zero attention to anything that isn’t their hobbies.

1
lemmy.world

No one outside the USA cares about the politics of who owns what social network

Crazy I know

-1
LH0ezVTreply
sh.itjust.works

I am outside of the US, and I do care. Biggest army and economy and so on. Even if not, I would not want to be associated with, idk, Australian wannabe tyrants either.

1
lemm.ee

So what’s the opinion here between Signal and SimpleX?

Signal gets all the attention, and seems more approachable but ties to a phone number which can be a big deal.

SimpleX ties to nothing but I could absolutely see people I know fucking it up and wondering where their “account” went.

So, Signal as an common man’s adoptable compromise and SimpleX to nerd out with full “opsec” and disposability? That about right?

8

So now we know what he kid's nickname will be when he gets herpes in high school

1
Illecorsreply
lemmy.cafe

I'm trying to use simplex, mainly for the instance's chat. 2 things to say:

  • notifications work perfectly even without play store
  • every device has a separate account - I can't reuse the same one. Not the end of the world, but it's really annoying
3

From the looks of it, the variety of ways you can purposefully or accidentally destroy your local database, and the strict limits on accessing your profile, really gives me the feeling SimpleX is intended to be extremely disposable and deniable.

After playing with it I just don’t see it being used for anything expected to be convenient or ongoing. Regarding the one device per account thing, I think the whole point is you just protect your one app, nobody is sneaking in your laptop or tablet, no remote leaks possible from a sync engine. On iOS you can link to a desktop app, but your phone must remain not just on, but in the app and on the pair screen. One twitch out, PC disconnects.

Feels like something for journalists, whistleblowers, protesters, and all the bad ones. It’s a burner app for your burner phone.

3

Signal has been under way more scrutiny than SimpleX. In both academic papers and security audits.

2
lemm.ee

Twitter should have been regulated as a common carrier and one rich asshole shouldn’t have been allowed to buy it, regardless of their politics

6

Most social media should be public domain or at least have standardised open APIs, it's the logical way to go for a free society with healthy governments and institutions. As it is right now it's like private companies owning the streets..

3

Honestly I feel all news and social messenging services would be better served if they were forced to be public owned.

3