"We're going to force this AI into every program you use and then because you 'agreed' to use it we get to claim ownership of things created with it and use all your data to train it! It's a win-win (for me only)"
No, it's bait. The actual series is far more weird and not sexual. It devolves into these women with some sort of weird monkey man looking on and being tormented in the shower.
The artist did realize how popular this image has become, and has since pivoted to making only weirdly sexy photos of these women.
His name is Eugeny Hramenkov if you're going to go searching.
Okay so this is from a goofy photo shoot by the extraordinarily talented musician Phoebe Bridgers as well as Maggie Rogers (whom I’m less familiar with) to promote a song they did together. What you’re talking about is a surreal photo series called “Understanding Joshua” by the artist Charlie White, which is about, among other things, post-coital depression and male body insecurity.
I have seen this image with different captions several times on Lemmy but every time I wonder where it was from. Is it an indie movie or porn? (That could be a game to be fair). Indie or porno
33 replies
I get the sentiment, but I actually want what's in the image.
And also, milk has nutritional values
And you get it from a dom mommy. Good nutrition can be fun!
Theenk u, dommy
Lmao there's always atleast one mf who asks for sauce for this meme template
......sauce........
::: spoiler Spoiler here you go :::
Umm. Well. I agree with the sentiment, but. I think you may have misread the tenor of this image...
The blonde mommy is hurting the other one.
Too much milk makes her tummy hurt.
Right. Which is what
I wantthe other girl wantsThank you for your insight, SatansMaggotyCumFart
Source? For science.
It's SFW post on Instagram. Not anything wierd I know I was disappointed too.
I vaguely recall someone saying that a porn group were going to make a porn based on the image due to its popularity?
I don't have the source, but from what I know it's just a stock image and not what you're hoping for.
Edit: still not porn, but the source is an Instagram post
cows or oats
"We're going to force this AI into every program you use and then because you 'agreed' to use it we get to claim ownership of things created with it and use all your data to train it! It's a win-win (for me only)"
The image is from a porn, right? It has all the wrong signals showing.
No, it's bait. The actual series is far more weird and not sexual. It devolves into these women with some sort of weird monkey man looking on and being tormented in the shower.
The artist did realize how popular this image has become, and has since pivoted to making only weirdly sexy photos of these women.
His name is Eugeny Hramenkov if you're going to go searching.
Thank you but no thank you. I'm fine as I am. That is enough information for me.
Lmao ditto I have enough trauma 🤣
I know what you're talking about but I don't think that's the same photo series. Now it's driving me crazy and I need to find it.
Without knowing the source I'm unable to verify your statement
The girls did a brief interview about it.
It's not a porn, it's from one of their Instagrams, but they danced around the fact that it's clearly tapping into some eroticism.
"some"
Yeah it'd be handy to know the source, to confirm. For science, of course.
Okay so this is from a goofy photo shoot by the extraordinarily talented musician Phoebe Bridgers as well as Maggie Rogers (whom I’m less familiar with) to promote a song they did together. What you’re talking about is a surreal photo series called “Understanding Joshua” by the artist Charlie White, which is about, among other things, post-coital depression and male body insecurity.
My parent constantly has post-coital depression.
I hate that I know where this is from
I have seen this image with different captions several times on Lemmy but every time I wonder where it was from. Is it an indie movie or porn? (That could be a game to be fair). Indie or porno
2 girls 1 cup, hope I’m wrong
It's OK, you're wrong.
So happy to be wrong. Thanks