Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on lemmy.ca
nottheonion·Not The Onionbysik0fewl

I knew one day I’d have to watch powerful men burn the world down – I just didn’t expect them to be such losers | Rebecca Shaw

I don’t know if anyone else has noticed this but everything seems to be going down the tubes quite fast. And not fun tubes, like at a waterpark. The “ending in shit” kind. The issues are complicated, the reasons diverse, but there are a few culprits who have been making themselves extremely visible.

I knew one day I’d have to watch powerful men burn the world down – I just didn’t expect them to be such losers | Rebecca Shawhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/16/i-knew-one-day-id-have-to-watch-powerful-men-burn-the-world-down-i-just-didnt-expect-them-to-be-such-losersOpen linkView original on lemmy.ca
298

13 replies

RQG
lemmy.world

The issues are complicated, the reasons diverse?

I was sure it was just capitalism and greed for money and power all over again.

38

it's also attention seeking. there are billionaires you hardly ever see and then there's the lizard, the cybertruck nerd and the pee guy.

23
lemm.ee

Everyone knows life on earth is going to end if we don’t stop emitting carbon

This is not what the science claims at all.

7
jonnereply
infosec.pub

Yeah, it's just going to suck for humans for a few million years, some endangered species are going to go extinct, but life will definitely continue.

16
lemm.ee

Nope, not like that either. The science shows it’s gonna destroy human habitats along the coastline, if no mitigating steps are taken such as they have been in the netherlands and new orleans (dikes to hold back rising sea levels).

That’s about it for the negative effects.

On the positive side, there’s going to be greater crop yield per acre, and fewer deaths from cold.

-29

Increasing temperatures will lead to increased human deaths due to high heat, far more than the reduction in cold deaths.

Crop yield per acre is not going to increase. What are you basing this off, the general notion that plants need CO2 for photosynthesis, so more CO2 equals more growth? Because the reality is that crop yield looks likely to decrease, because of ecosystem disruption

8

Yeah, it will just have huge impacts on mankind, the economy, wellbeing, and life itself. No biggie.

15

Unimaginable human misery on the horizon and your response is to pull a “sorry your response must take a form of a question.”

4
Spacehooksreply
reddthat.com

My faith warns of the mark of the beast. Carbon Is the 666 atom which released from the ground heats the earth.

0
Maevereply
kbin.earth

Wait till you learn of the 616 papyri.

7
Spacehooksreply
reddthat.com

Oh interesting. Well 666 is heating the earth so it's supported by science lol

-3

I'm not even mad! I'm just into certain mythologies a bit enough to hear of random stuff like this.

2

You reached the end

I knew one day I’d have to watch powerful men burn the world down – I just didn’t expect them to be such losers | Rebecca Shaw | Spyke