Spyke
politics·politics byMicroWave

Supreme Court leans in favor of state-enforced age limits on porn websites

Summary

The Supreme Court signaled support for state-enforced age-verification laws for pornographic websites, as argued in Texas’ case.

Conservative justices cited the surge in children’s access to online pornography and technological changes, calling for reconsideration of past 1st Amendment rulings.

Texas' law requires websites to confirm users are 18+, a model supported by 23 Republican-led states.

Critics argue it could chill adult free speech, but justices noted filtering software is ineffective. The court may uphold the law or send it back for further review by the 5th Circuit.

Supreme Court leans in favor of state-enforced age limits on porn websiteshttps://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2025-01-15/supreme-court-porn-websitesOpen linkView original on lemmy.world
yiffit.net

"Come on man, just give us an ID linked to your IP address! We won't use it for anything, I swear! We will also make sure it is kept in the most secure servers!"

77
Pennomireply
lemmy.world

I’m shocked that the DoD doesn’t step in to slap down this kind of insecure shit. Leaking more personal details to more parties is a national security nightmare.

35

The DoD is salivating over this one. They get to link IPs to passports.

16

Let's not let something like justice get in the way of expensive useless bullshit and graft, it's the Roberts court

3
lemmy.world

Can't wait for all Red states to instantly mirror the Taliban government.

54

The dominionist movement took a lot of lessons from Iran, and seek to create a similar society but with christianity instead of islam.

4

Tired of it being everybody else's job to "protect the children" rather than their parents.

54
lemmy.world

Do changes in technology justify curbing the second amendment, too, or just the first? I mean, guns have certainly changed a lot since the bill of rights was written.

44

I'm sure it doesn't apply to only the 1st amendment! They'll apply it to all the other amendments too (unless they don't want to)

7
midwest.social

Age-verification HTTP requests are deeply rooted in this nation’s history.

40
lemmy.world

So what they're saying is that times have changed and things that used to be considered rights guaranteed by the Constitution need to change with the times.

I'm sure this logic can be applied to other rights as well, as long as those rights aren't laid out in any amendments that come after 1 and before 3.

28
lemmy.world

I like that the arguement is that there are technical limitations to age restricting graphic content, so the best course of action is limiting people's rights.

Seems like people's rights should be more important.

25
pawb.social

If they actually cared, just publish a standard that sites declare their minimum age range. Then make apple and Google add a "child mode" that filters this at the DNS level when you set up a device. As it's opt-in, sites would be responsible for what they're declaring

Tech savvy kids will probably be able to get past it, but let's be honest... Nothing would stop them

Honestly, I'd even support something like this, and I think you'd get voluntary adoption. Advertisers would like this, it's not very burdensome technically, and it would give a safer legal framework for everyone

But of course, this isn't really about the kids...

3

I live in a state that has porn ID laws. I did not vote for this.

When the bill was signed into law was when I heard of it. I was fucking livid. Not a single peep from any of the many, many groups I'm a part of. It was almost like it was snuck through last minute.

I emailed my Republican representatives, which of course support the bill and sent me a form letter back.

These laws are impossible to repeal due to their "what about the children" arguments. I'm so fucking tempted to spear phish these assholes to publish their browser histories but who has the time.

17
Coreidanreply
lemmy.world

As if republicans care about children. They want you having sex instead of masturbating. They want you poor from having kids instead of having an abortion or using contraceptives. They want more bodies to feed the us military complex.

8
CellarRatreply
sh.itjust.works

This reminds me of a geroge carlin qoute

"They want live babies so they can make dead soldier"

It's sad how it's still relevant almost 30 years later.

9

Stand up comedy is too easy to access for kids. Medical shows are too easy to access for kids. Shows questioning the Bible are too easy to access for kids...

0
lemmy.world

You know they can just outlaw VPNs as they did it in many countries already...

6

Yeah but they won't cuz this bill is bullshit virtue signaling

-2

You reached the end

Supreme Court leans in favor of state-enforced age limits on porn websites | Spyke