Spyke

Syndicated from the fediverse. Read and engage on the original instance.

View original on discuss.tchncs.de

18 replies

lemmy.world

We have new version out!

Oh, that's good I guess. So... what's new?

We can not tell you yet.

57
programming.dev

🗣️🗣️🗣️

We’re still preparing the notes for this release, and will post them here when they are ready. Please check back later.

🔥🔥🔥

52
feddit.org

I still remember when Firefox decided to go with Chrome-like versioning to show progress. No more v4.5.1. but v87.1! Still bugs me a little bit, I liked the more relaxed attitude. Now versioning is changing again here and there, now it's the year, like 2025.1 and I think that is a little pragmatic but probably a pretty good idea. They should go for that!

28
NekuSoulreply
lemmy.nekusoul.de

Year-based version numbers are pretty neat IMO, particularly for applications. Not only can you quickly estimate how up-to-date any particular application is, it also avoids the version number racing problem between competing applications, because some people equate lower version numbers with a less developed application.

For programming libraries though semantic versioning is still the good ol' reliable.

25

Higher version — more Firefox. I like more Firefox.

14

The 103 early hints is nice to finally see in the network tab, stopping a scroll by placing the fingers down on the track pad, is neat too!

Solid update AFAIC

2

You reached the end