Spyke

I was going to suggest Tassie is also classically missing but the entirety of SE Asia isn't on this one

6
VerPoilureply
sopuli.xyz

And the big one that's dead center is mostly useless

43

Yeah! It literally just adds a bit of Cape and Horn to Africa. Without it you'd have a nice circle for the 3 old world continents.

6

Africa needs to be enlarged quite a bit and there’s a whole continent missing. Not bad otherwise.

6
lemm.ee

The entire southeast Asia, which makes up maybe half the majority of the world population disappeared.

24
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

It was the first thing I noticed missing too, but it's "only" 0.7 billion people.

It probably should be integrated into Australia somehow, to keep circle count low.

3
m0darnreply
lemmy.ca

I would say it's east Asia and South Asia that are missing, not "south east". It's like 3 billion isn't it?

1
CanadaPlusreply
lemmy.sdf.org

Uhh, so you're reading that all as Persia, Russia and Mongolia, then?

Yeah, India and China are each over a billion, and then with SE Asia it could easily be 3.5. We're at eight, so that's not quite half, but it's close.

not “south east”.

Y'know, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and friends. Have you never heard it grouped that way?

1
m0darnreply
lemmy.ca

Russia is there, maybe you could say Mongolia too.

The near east and middle east are kinda there. Like Arabian peninsula seems

My point regarding south east Asia is that it's not just the south-east, it's the all south Asia, east Asia that are missing. (And also naturally the south east)

It's very euro centric to dedicate two circles exclusively to representing the Mediterranean but to leave India and China off, and Africa dwarfed.

1

I mean one of those circles does absolutely nothing but add a bit of Cape and a bit of Horn to Africa, and it looks about the right size to me - smaller than Asia, bigger than everything else.

1
rnerclereply
sh.itjust.works

can you, as a perception exercise, try to see some of the other missing territories and list them in a reply?

3

India isn't really missing so much as not distinguished, but also that.

Every island is missing, starting by size with Greenland.

Northern Canada is pointed instead of concave with Hudson's Bay. Antarctica is also missing but that counts more as a stylistic choice because it's so frequently done.

2
lemmy.blahaj.zone

A more minimalist world map, to paraphrase a 1970s TV scientist, would be one blue pixel

21

my own attempt at it

as can be seen with this diagram, i prefer straight lines over circles when it comes to geopolitics

also, i'm sorry if this offends somebody somehow

20
Baggiereply
lemmy.zip

Can't believe you forgot New Zealand smh

11

When you have just enough resolution for Australia, you don’t really have the option to include smaller details.

4

Mandela effect. Here are so many people who seam to remember all these islands

1
lemmy.world

Needs a couple of more circles in there to make India and Southeast Asia pop out.

9

I would also add one more to NA to make it as wide as it should be. It's pretty skinny here.

8

I love this. I'm guessing there's a better way to choose circles, though.

Why have one for the Great Australian Bight? Just so it doesn't end up being an entire circle? That's kind of a missed opportunity to do a Philippine Sea circle and include SEA.

Edit: What about one for each continent, a couple for the Indian ocean, and then a big Pacific Ocean one that takes out of Australia, East Asia (forming SEA) and the two in America?

8

You reached the end

Minimalist world map | Spyke