Spyke

Newer motorola smartphones promise 5 years of software updates. Everyone before is screwed. But, buying the newest should be fine if they research before making a purchase.

4

I see a lot of people going back to the old www . bankwebsite . com.

Phone apps are just modern toolbars.

And in case you forgot that scourge:

12
jolreply
discuss.tchncs.de

I have 3 bank accounts and all require mobile apps. The Web Apps are limited in what they can do.

4
infosec.pub

That really does suck, and is poor product design. Besides using the desktop site, I'm not really sure how to easily get around that.

5
ub0x5jtkreply
lemdro.id

It is a good design, especially security wise. Many banks require 2FA from their app/companion app.

1
infosec.pub

Logging into the bank app using the bank app as the mfa is good design? Is that what you mean?

1

Yes, not ideal, but better than mere website.

Even better option would be a dedicated password manager with MFA like Proton Pass etc. but banks use their authentications in various ways and are regulated more.

1
piefed.jeena.net

That will mean that they'll be able to sell more phones because people won't be able to run the bank app on a older machine?

9
limerodreply
reddthat.com

This will limit phones without longterm software support. The ones which don't provide decent enough software support will be left in the dust.

8
smegreply
feddit.uk

Hopefully a small pain which will encourage better behaviour overall in the future. Hopefully.

3

You are mentioning a domino effect, but the main goal is beneficial in itself, increasing security. I hope people posting here are not using Windows XP in 2024, or have not updated their Linux packages since 2017.

Go search for how long companies take to patch a vulnerability. It is like 60 days for critical CVEs on average, 300 days overall.

1

You reached the end

Banking apps can now require recent Android security updates | Spyke