Spyke
regnnreply
infosec.pub

Depends on the flow from the faucet.

If it is filling 1 faster then water can move between then order will be 1->2->5

If it is slow enough then just 5 fills.

Everything else will be dry. Between 2 to 3 is sealed too. Without lids there is a lot of issues.

67

If the faucet pressure and flow is so big that it spills out without filling the bucket, the spill could reach 4. Given that the walls of that bucket are extremely cold, the water could freeze over the drain, making that the first bucket to fill up.

So I would say 4.

4

Because the inlet and outlet of 2 are the same size, 2 will always be filled last, if at all. Once 5 is filled, it will spill out the edges of the container rather than back flowing.

9

Technically if it's faster, then at some point 3 will start to get water. Due to 2 overflowing and filling the space between the 2 cups.

6 probably, maybe would, but not 100% sure.

Which means that really 4 can't fill up over time.

2
lemmy.billiam.net

Yeah nothing will fill up until 5 is full. And then since 4 has a leak it, I think basically ONLY 5 will fill.

32
Duraniereply
leminal.space

The line is blocked between 2-3, so 3,6,&7 don't get anything.

3
lemm.ee

Given enough pressure, bucket 1 will never be filled, and it will overflow to 2 and 3. Depending on the flow, 2 could be the first to fill up.

6
affiliatereply
lemmy.world

even if there’s no floor, they will all fill eventually. it may cause another noah’s ark situation, but what matters is that all the containers will be filled.

3
lemmy.world

All the candidates are thanked for their time and asked to leave except you, who get invited to join MIB.

28
lemmy.world

Unless I completely misunderstand how this works, I think 5 is the only one that will fill up. It then overflows, preventing any of the taller ones from filling. 7 is shallower but won't start filling until 3 gets fuller than 5, which it never will. This would be true whether the blockage between 2 and 3 is a mistake or not.

85
sh.itjust.works

You are correct and I agree, but look again.

At the comments.

Then at the image.

Forget all about the water, and the question.

If necessary, reread the title.

Groan.

67
Chip_Ratreply
lemmy.world

Please help. I have nightmares of being in a room where everyone else is just waiting patiently for me to remember the thing I forgot/figure out what is happening.

Help

29

Yeah I don't get it. Why does anyone care if the comic was set up that way and if other people copied it. It's not funny? It's not anything?

7
turmacarreply
lemmy.world

It's an in-joke.

The comic used to be big in the ~2000s nerd space, mostly by being one of the earlier video game focused webcomics that hit it big. The author had/has a.... polarizing personality and the comic itself went from dick jokes and game references to super serious miscarriage storyline at the drop of a hat.

Que endless satire.

9

I have never understood the meme but that clues me in a bit, thank you.

Fyi, it's "Cue endless satire."

Que is Spanish for "what" and is pronounced similar to Kay.

Queue is a bunch of extra letters standing in line after the "Q"

Cue is "it's time" - imagine an actor backstage being poked with a pool cue to get them going.

5
isildunreply
sh.itjust.works

I think you’re right. Unfortunately, we’ll still have to chalk this up as a loss.

20

Like losing the game? That was also annoying and the internet stopped doing it eventually.

1
lemmy.world

1 fills up first. the spigot is much winder than the tube so the glass will fill faster than it can drain.

Also rule

59

That's assuming the valve is open all the way and that there's a bunch of water pressure behind the spigot. It should be entirely possible to create a very slow trickle by having a massive body of water behind the spigot (making it functionally infinite) but having only a small part of the entrance beneath the surface.

5
lemmy.ca

5, but it also depends on the circumstances. What liquid is used, temperature, viscosity, etc. There's some material science stuff that's far beyond the intended scope of this question.

43
bartvblreply
lemmy.world

1 fills up halfway, which then overflows in 2. The bottom of 2 has a pipe running out of it, which is directed into 5

17

I depends on the inflow vs outflow of 1 - it might fill up first. But otherwise, yeah, i would say 5 as well.

22
lemmy.world

I actually started to figure out the sequence...then I realized...fuck you, take my up vote

43
feddit.dk

All of them are already full of air.

36
programming.dev
  1. 5 which begins to overflow into the room
  2. 7
  3. 4 and 6
  4. 2 and 3
  5. 1

This is assuming this is a cross section of something 3d and not something 2d otherwise air packets would get trapped and prevent some of this.

26
lemmy.world

5 and 4 are the only ones getting water other than 1 and 2. 3 has a solid line blocking the flow into it, and even if that wasn't there, since 4 has a hole/drain in the bottom and 5 can overflow, 3 can't fill enough to reach the outflow. 5 is the only one that can fill up.

15
Lennnyreply
lemmy.world

Just pick this up and put it into a tub. Now they're all full. Take that math!

3

Depends on how much you turn on the tap. If you fürn it up completely its 1,else its 5.

23

Depends on diameter of the pipes leading out too. They look small in the image, but if they're big enough to handle the max flow out of the faucet, 5 will still fill up first.

7
lemmy.ml

i hate you.

edit: read replies before telling me that 7 is walled off

but ignoring my loss, if everything is pressurized i think 7 if unpressurized i think 5

21
Xoriffreply
lemmy.world

Ignoring the walled off stuff, can you ELI5 why pressurized vs not changes things and how so?

3

my logic was that it's the shortest way and therefore has the least resistance and therefore the highest flowrate.

while unpressurized gravity would take over

1

Might be an airlock? It's hard for me to predict how fluids will really flow

1
fedia.io

I'd recognise that pattern anywhere, but I focused in on the problem and almost didn't notice your dasterdly deed

19
blackn1ghtreply
feddit.uk

What pattern? Judging by the comments this is some kind of trick but I don't know what it is lol

6

As other replies have said and linked to, it's meant to be "loss"

Though OP slightly changed the template to fit the puzzle, as the right hand corner is meant to have the shorter piece. That threw me off as well.

2
lemmy.world

There's only one "one" in the diagram, so I'm gonna say the one marked "1." Pretty easy.

13

Wouldn't scale and viscosity play a role? Seriously, imagine a river vs a capillary tube. Also how many dimensions? And forces involved? Is that a blockage between 2 and 3? Are the walls breakable? How will the fluid hold air? Are the lines into structure 5 lower than the walls? Is this in a vacuum?

10

There is no mention of any fluid involved, just a faucet. So lets think inside of the box and assume we have some form of 2d-gravity and it is going to rain a newtonian fluid? I think most surface area on the top is draining into 5. If it snows the whole sheet can turn white and the problem is gone, too.

5

It does not specify what they are being filled with. They are all already filled with air.

1

Even if you assume that it is not blocked, it is still 5. The pipe from 2 to 3 is never reached because 4 leaks out the hole in the bottom. Assume that the hole in the bottom is a flaw and 4 still leaks out the top before the pipe to 3 is reached.

3
toddestanreply
lemm.ee

1 can also fill up if the flow from the faucet is higher than what can exit through the pipe connecting to 2.

4
Seasm0kereply
lemmy.world

There it is!!! That connector is too narrow, only way it isnt 1 is if the pressure is criminally low.

1
lemmy.dbzer0.com

I came in to comment, "it probably would probably be 5, but I think it would depend on the flow rate?"

But reading the other comments, it looks like I'm OOTL on something? 🧐

8

There might be something further upstream. All the way upstream.
::: spoiler spoiler-title point zero, in fact :::

4
feddit.nl

I got it! First, the free floating faucet will drop into bucket one. The impact will certainly break its connecting tube and broken 1 + faucet collapse into 4. Therefore 4 will be broken but full of shards.

6

If you're lucky, there is a bottom below the hole that everything is standing on. Otherwise everything is loss in a void.

2

The number of people in these comments who already understand the self-siphoning nature of water with zero explanation required makes me so proud to be here among them.

3
lemmy.world

Depends on the flow rate, but most likely 1 if the tap is running fast. Otherwise I have no idea.

Also, what's with these comments? What's so special/clever about this pic?

3

The boxes are placed such that they mimic the positions of the characters in the comic.

That comic got memed a lot, including a lot of people who "reduced" the characters to just their orientation and position in the comic.

Other examples:

| ||

|| |_

:.|:;

2
1371113reply
lemmy.world

Yeah, a lot of people acting like this is some well known thing… I’ve been using the internet since the early 90s and I’ve never heard of this comic, let alone this specific strip so it must be some 4chan shit or other oldschool board.

3

It's well known in the fact that once you've run across it and someone explains it, you'll usually see it later on without trouble after a few times. Although some forms of it are quite subtle, like this one. The title is the hint, otherwise I doubt many would have caught on. That being said, if you never happened across it, you'd wonder what the hell everyone is talking about. About like any other meme really.

1

Ha. Trick question! All of them are already full of air, and niether the flow rate nor the direction (or lack) of gravity was specified anyway. You lose. :)

2