Doubtful that a rubber dong is capable of communicating consent, and you can't grant consent on behalf of another. Anon might indeed be a rapist, but girl is a sex trafficker.
The post does point out that there's a table full of penis models (so essentially dildos) and that the task is to put a condom on one of them.
A bodyless fake penis is clearly not a sentient being so the only way a violation of consent happened if consent applied to inanimate objects. That is, of course, a ridiculous and easily attacked proposition.
In the end this would be an example of trying to make a valid point but making it in a clumsy way.
You really have to get into that mercenary mindset. You're obviously not responsible for your actions, if you're just executing tasks someone else wants you to do. Smh
If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can't be a raping their dildo. It ain't difficult.
In the context they're obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can't be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.
Reminds me of that bit on The Office about safe sex. Darryl says something like "Oh, I didn't know we were doing trick questions. What's the safest way to go skiing? Not go skiing."
If someone sprung that trap on me, I'd say "no, it's a toy. A toy doesn't have any consent right or consciousness.... just like a woman" and than I'd just walk away. If you want to be cunts, ww can be cunts
It is not an insult to all women. It is directed at one single individual and it is their level we're palying here. Gender is not something that would usually be an insultable quality, but since they're trying to paint me as a rapist, they've put gender on the table. They're also the one who threw the unintelligent "all men are rapists" rethoric, so I'll throw the equally unintelligent "all women are objects". Fight them with their own weapons. I know I will not win an argument this way, but that was not the goal here. This will just make them feel bad for a second and me feel good for a second. It is cheap and dirty, but sometimes that's what you need.
Either this only happened to the FOAF of someone interviewed on FoxNews, or if it did, it was a false-flag operation organised by Turning Point or some similar group to radicalise young men against feminism and consent culture, as anyone who gave it a momentโs thought would see that that would be its outcome.
Or, girl was flirting and op missed his big chance!:
girl: You didn't ask for consent.
op: [hands penis statue back] Can you show me?
girl: [asks penis for consent. Mimics penis responding 'yes' in Muppet voice. Proceeds to slowly and erotically apply condom while maintaining eye contact with op.]
op: I'm not getting it. Do you offer private tutoring?
"ma'am, the penis's owner, you, literally told me to put a condom on it. Not sure how much more consent I could have."
Some bitch told me to put the condom I thought she got the consent
Doubtful that a rubber dong is capable of communicating consent, and you can't grant consent on behalf of another. Anon might indeed be a rapist, but girl is a sex trafficker.
Why is everyone getting angry at this woman who most likely doesn't even exist
It's fun and risk free
People love hating people. Simple as
Turns out, engaging with the hypothetical creates more interesting discussion than saying "fake" and nothing else.
True, but in this case it feels like beating up a woke strawman
It happens to every greentext post on lemmy, gotta bring em back down to reality and let them know it's fake and gay.
Greentexts are improv comedy and everyone is polite enough to play along instead of trying to argue what is clearly a made-up story for laughs
The entire premise of the green-text is that it's an autistic work of fiction. Pointing that out is redundant.
Fake: anon speaks to a woman
Gay: anon investigates model penises
Case closed, we can wrap this one up boys.
Only after asking for consent
Being asked to do a task by the person responsible for administering the task automatically obviates you from being classified as a rapist.
"We were only following orders."
What? If another person asks me to to rape a person then does that absolve me from being a rapist? Am i misunderstanding you?
Yes.
They are penis models, not human beings.
It is context specific.
If a human being asked you to do sex things to them and you decide to do it then you have been granted enthusiastic consent to do those sex things.
So if they are model penises but you are not asked to put the condom on them, but you do anyway, is that sexual assault?
Context: they arent human. So, no. Of course it isn't. Stop baiting.
The original comment doesnt include anything about objects... It only talks about tasks and people asking you to complete tasks.
Ofcourse you cant rape an object, but the comment wasnt talking about that, it was talking about something much more generalized.
The post does point out that there's a table full of penis models (so essentially dildos) and that the task is to put a condom on one of them.
A bodyless fake penis is clearly not a sentient being so the only way a violation of consent happened if consent applied to inanimate objects. That is, of course, a ridiculous and easily attacked proposition.
In the end this would be an example of trying to make a valid point but making it in a clumsy way.
You really have to get into that mercenary mindset. You're obviously not responsible for your actions, if you're just executing tasks someone else wants you to do. Smh
Nah, that's why I wait for my wife to tell me to make toast so I can do that without. Mercenary mindset!
If the person who put the dildos there and handed you the condom is asking you to put that condom on one of the dildos, then the person that owns the dildo already gave you consent to use their dildo, thereby you can't be a raping their dildo. It ain't difficult.
In the context they're obviously saying that the other person initiating sexual activity is consent in of itself, ergo you can't be a rapist for reciprocating that consent.
We are talking about dildos dude.
"Did you ask them for their consent before putting them here on display, naked?"
"If you have an issue with being out on display, say no"
"....."
Shoulda put the condom on your own penis. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ
Still missing consent agreement
This is difficult for people with schizophrenia
Reminds me of that bit on The Office about safe sex. Darryl says something like "Oh, I didn't know we were doing trick questions. What's the safest way to go skiing? Not go skiing."
Ask the ski boots for consent before shoving your foot in them.
If someone sprung that trap on me, I'd say "no, it's a toy. A toy doesn't have any consent right or consciousness.... just like a woman" and than I'd just walk away. If you want to be cunts, ww can be cunts
That's a pretty toxic joke dude
It's not a joke, it's an expression of my disgust for the entrapment.
Normal people have the intelligence required to express disgust without insulting all women.
It is not an insult to all women. It is directed at one single individual and it is their level we're palying here. Gender is not something that would usually be an insultable quality, but since they're trying to paint me as a rapist, they've put gender on the table. They're also the one who threw the unintelligent "all men are rapists" rethoric, so I'll throw the equally unintelligent "all women are objects". Fight them with their own weapons. I know I will not win an argument this way, but that was not the goal here. This will just make them feel bad for a second and me feel good for a second. It is cheap and dirty, but sometimes that's what you need.
Still funny
Was it because OP deftly applied the condom by mouth?
"I hereby give you my consent to put a condom on my penis, random penile scientist girl."
Either this only happened to the FOAF of someone interviewed on FoxNews, or if it did, it was a false-flag operation organised by Turning Point or some similar group to radicalise young men against feminism and consent culture, as anyone who gave it a momentโs thought would see that that would be its outcome.
Or, girl was flirting and op missed his big chance!:
girl: You didn't ask for consent.
op: [hands penis statue back] Can you show me?
girl: [asks penis for consent. Mimics penis responding 'yes' in Muppet voice. Proceeds to slowly and erotically apply condom while maintaining eye contact with op.]
op: I'm not getting it. Do you offer private tutoring?
Oh, theyโre real penises of actual models, not model penises.
trolling is a art
*an /j
trolling is an /j
this "/j" looks like a massive scream for mercy in this case ngl
"Sorry, it was my first time with a dildo."
(stare in silence for a moment too long... go ahead... respond...
What did you use the other times ๐
Oh, I'm vegan...
After watching a lot of Game Changer, where they always ask for concent for the mannequins, I would also ask just for the bit.
What if he didn't have a condom?
Reddit spacing
Best come back is did you ask before?