Spyke

Wisconsin can fuck off and die. But this will give Canadia control of most of the great lakes.

2
lemmy.ca

Canada's population is 40 million. This would add 80ish (edit:) million more people to that. So, it's not Canada annexing the blue states, it's the blues states seceding and then annexing Canada to achieve territorial contiguity.

41
lemmy.dbzer0.com

No annexing. The blue states join with Canada to establish a union of states. We could call it "United States" or something, or idk, I'm not good with names.

45

United Provinces, we don't need to keep baggage associated with United States

24

Since the remaining states are run by a convict, they could be the Con-federated States or something like that.

21

Gotta warn you though, seems the only nice piece of nature you'll get is on the border with BC and they did a real number on the environment in the north.

But you guys can probably actually fix it rather than celebrate CO2 like what these close are doing now with provincial legislature.

1
lemmy.world

Let's be real, it's city vs. country no matter where you are.

29

Not even.

Maricopa County is effectively one giant suburb and the numbers were about 50-50 for each candidate.

5
lemmy.dbzer0.com

It really isn't, Maine is rural af. We're called the South of the North for a reason. However we are weirdly progressive for how rural we are

4

Yeah it is generally higher population density means more progressive. Maine is just weird. Even historically. Historically very pro-abolition, also pretty pro-women's suffrage, also very pro-prohibition. However the state also didn't start voting democrat till around the 60s or 70s. Fairly early legalizers of marijuana and also fairly quick for gay marriage.

2
lemmy.world

Not even remotely based. States are not internally homogenous. "Let's take all the Democrats and job with Canada" is a shitlib take.

20

I'm hearing a "cringe" here, though I've heard quite a few "based"s (no consesus as is tradition for leftist discourse) ... I think "based" is winning?

9

Better divide Oregon and Washington states in half. The east side of each state all voted red. Not sure how California voted.

15

I briefly saw this meme on my dad's phone while he was browsing facebook. He's a right wing Trump voter.

So take from that what you will.

14

Yep, this is originally a righty post. That's why I'm so confused that it's actually kind of based. The rough consensus here is that it's based, so we have bi-partisan support. Let's get this on the Congress floor!

7
IceBladereply
lemmynsfw.com

"Based" is just slang. It generally has a positive connotation. So the original poster is essentially asking if this is a good idea or not.

8
xxd
discuss.tchncs.de

The swing states are gonna be kicking themselves that they missed this chance after they come back to their senses.

6
lemmy.dbzer0.com

Is that for or against? Do we want extra states or an "I told you so" more? Genuinely difficult question.

3
xxdreply
discuss.tchncs.de

That really is difficult! Id suggest to just let the 'United States of Canada' vote on it after the next 'Jesusland' election. But I'm not from the US so I'm in no position to give a suggestion really.

2

Wait for me i wanna come too. I just gotta move out of my red state first, ca sounds nice, real nice

5